[p2p-research] Fw: babysitting coop as civic network

[Michel Bauwens]

Done1

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 9:31 PM, Neal Gorenflo <neal at shareable.net> wrote:

> Michel,
>
> I hope my short post stimulates some discussion.  The line of thought needs
> more development.  And I'm sure there are others who have thought longer and
> deeper about the panarchy model as a forecasting tool, though I haven't
> found that community.  I think it could be an exceptionally useful model,
> especially if combined with other forecasting tools.
>
> Check this link for the resource section that recommends the primer
> Resilience Thinking and links to a free, shorter version on the Resilience
> Alliance site:
>
> http://shareable.net/blog/resilience-primer
>
> Here's the link to the panarchy model on Flickr, it's Creative Commons, so
> you can embed it as long as you provide attribution.
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/49503058070@N01/745686
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Neal
>
> --
>
> Neal Gorenflo || Publisher, http://shareable.net || @ShareableDesign
>
>
>   On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 7:22 AM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> where could I find a more encyclopedic article outlining the different
>> phases?
>>
>> Michel
>>   On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Neal Gorenflo <neal at shareable.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Michel, I took a crack at it.  Is this what you had in mind?  If it suits
>>> you, feel free to copy edit and format as needed.  Neal
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> My colleague Michel Bauwens asked me to share some thoughts about the
>>> timing of a shift to a P2P world using the panarchy model<http://shareable.net/blog/resilience-primer>developed by the Resilience
>>> Alliance <http://www.resalliance.org/1.php> as a guide (see diagram).
>>> This is an interesting challenge as I'm not familiar with it as an economic
>>> forecasting tool. However, I welcome the challenge because a recent event I
>>> co-hosted, Design 4 Resilience (D4R)<http://shareable.net/blog/design-4-resilience-thriving-in-an-uncertain-world>,
>>> asked participants to apply resilience thinking in unique ways outside of
>>> the normal use in academe and ecosystem management.
>>>
>>> That being said, what I share here is exploratory. My goal with this
>>> short post is just to introduce the possibility of using the panarchy model
>>> to learn something about where we are and what may come in the near future.
>>>
>>> The starting point is to understand that social and ecological systems
>>> tend to move through four recurring phases: growth and conservation
>>> (resources committed, stable, slow change, predictable), release and
>>> reorganization (resources freed up, chaos, fast change, opportunity). At the
>>> recent Viennese Talks on Resilience & Networks<http://shareable.net/blog/viennese-talks-on-resilience-networks>,
>>> the assumption was that the world system is in a late K, meaning approaching
>>> the end of the conservation phase and the beginning of the release phase.
>>>
>>> Here I share characteristics of the conservation phase with some
>>> corresponding real-world signals:
>>>
>>> -Increased rigidity: The long series of failed WTO talks.  The inability
>>> of leading governments to respond appropriately to climate change.
>>> -Slowing growth: Many stock analysts believe we're in a long-term secular
>>> bear market.
>>> -Increased specialization: this is the age of the long tail and 1,000
>>> true fans.  Specialization is escalating in the Internet age.
>>> -Bound up capital accumulation: Only recently, US and Germany's budgets
>>> are 100% committed to existing programs and debt servicing.  No money is
>>> available for new programs.
>>> -Increased efficiency: The rapid increase in computing power described by
>>> Moore's Law. The Toyota Prius is an cultural icon symbolizing efficiency.
>>>
>>> I share the perspective that we're in late K because we see unprecedented
>>> vulnerability in the global economy and environment that is resulting in
>>> dramatic episodes of disruption, and with increasing frequency. It appears
>>> that we are pushing against thresholds on many fronts, thresholds that once
>>> crossed result in swift, dramatic, and sometimes irreversible change.
>>> Release may be near.
>>>
>>> As to timing, the transition from conservation to release can be sudden.
>>> There is no way to predict exactly when the transition will start. I suspect
>>> that at the society scale, the timing of transition is influenced by human
>>> lifespans. Generational theory has much to about the relationship between
>>> cycles and generations. It suggests to me that it's no accident that we are
>>> experiencing late K crises as baby boomers begin to retire.
>>>
>>> One thing I would pay attention to is any change in pace of late K
>>> signals. My casual observation is that the frequency and magnitude of
>>> disruptions has accelerated since 9/11. The keynote at the Vienna Talks<http://fas-research.com/viennese-talks-on-resilience-a-retrospective>,
>>> Buzz Holling<http://fas-research.com/index.php?option=com_seyret&Itemid=313&id=9&lang=en&task=videodirectlink>,
>>> famed ecologist and founder of the Resilience Alliance, pointed to the fall
>>> of the Berlin Wall as a signal of the onset of late K.
>>>
>>> I would also take into account the relationship between geographic scales
>>> and the pace of change. Resilience thinking teaches us that change at large
>>> geographic scales is slow while there is more flexibility at lower scales.
>>> This dynamic argues for concentrating on bottom up strategies for change
>>> while staying engaged with higher scales albeit with more patience. This
>>> perspective also explains why cities have outstripped nations and
>>> international bodies in responding to crises such as climate change. Holling
>>> offered some personal advice along these lines at the Vienna Talks - stay
>>> positive by working on what you're passionate about while moderating your
>>> expectations that large institutions will change.
>>>
>>> Going forward, it may be difficult for the structures baby boomers built
>>> up to be maintained. Rather, new forms of organization may emerge in the
>>> nexus between a new generation, a different mix of resources, the rise of
>>> developing nations, and a new spatial fix<http://www.creativeclass.com/creative_class/2008/07/11/the-new-spatial-fix/>.
>>> The P2P blog and Shareable <http://shareable.net/> make a case that this
>>> is already happening.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Neal,
>>> >
>>> > this is a pretty crucial topic in terms of timing of change,
>>> >
>>> > is there any possibility that you write a paragraph, or two,  to
>>> publish with the graph, and  reference to your articles?
>>> >
>>> > thanks for considering it,
>>> >
>>> > otherwise, I'm asking sam and paul if they can help with this important
>>> topic,
>>> >
>>> > Michel
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Neal Gorenflo <neal at shareable.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi Michel,
>>> >> Here's a post that gives an overview of the four stage complex
>>> adaptive cycle that Buzz and others developed:
>>> >> http://shareable.net/blog/resilience-primer
>>> >> Late K is where the growth cycle slows dramatically or ends.  You see
>>> declining returns on complexity.  The system is organized at a critical
>>> state.  The frequency and magnitude of disturbances increases.  Yet change
>>> is impossible because resources are locked up in existing relationships.
>>>  The next stage is breakdown when resources are released.  This sets the
>>> stage for renewal.  The resilience mindset sees breakdown as necessary and
>>> positive.  It argues for co-management of the process rather than control or
>>> avoidance.  Most management systems are linear in orientation and try to
>>> manage for an ideal, stable state.  Resilience thinking argues for managing
>>> with the cycles in mind.  And in late K, managing with the expectation that
>>> big, unpredictable disturbances will happen.
>>> >> I also highly recommend these books:
>>> >> Panarchy:
>>> >> http://astore.amazon.com/shareable08-20/detail/1559638575
>>> >> The Collapse of Complex Societies:
>>> >> http://astore.amazon.com/shareable08-20/detail/052138673X
>>> >> And I just wrote this post which has a collection of signals that
>>> suggest our civilization is in late K.  That was certainly the assumption of
>>> Buzz and others at the recent Vienna resilience event:
>>> >> http://shareable.net/blog/viennese-talks-on-resilience-networks
>>> >> I hope this is helpful.
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >>
>>> >> Neal
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >>
>>> >> Neal Gorenflo || Publisher, http://shareable.net || @ShareableDesign
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Michel Bauwens <
>>> michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Hi neal,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> i'm very interested in the timing issue for p2p change,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> could you explain more in detail what the late K state is, and how
>>> and where buzz discusses this? (or send links if you know of any)
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Michel
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Neal Gorenflo <neal at shareable.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Alex,
>>> >>>> Very interesting about what you bring up about scale.  I spoke last
>>> week at the Viennese Talks About Resilience & Networks with Buzz Holling,
>>> Bernard Lietaer, Harald Katzmair, and others.
>>> >>>> A strong theme emerged about the importance of cross scale linkages.
>>>  In the resilience framework, adaptation is made much more difficult if
>>> there are no or weak cross-scale links.
>>> >>>> Yet, in the context of social change currently, Buzz made the point
>>> that political organization at the national and international level is so
>>> constrained, so unable to respond, that his advice was to not get depressed
>>> about it, it's natural at this phase of an adaptive cycle (late K), and
>>> instead do something positive you know about at your scale for the common
>>> good.
>>> >>>> Community organizing is perfect for this because it connects
>>> individuals with small groups and small groups with a neighborhood and a
>>> neighborhood to a city.  It connects all the scales where there still some
>>> room to maneuver.
>>> >>>> In the resilience context, p2p innovations are quite adaptive as
>>> work arounds the frozen upper scales creating new patterns of value creation
>>> that set the stage for a new economy that uses less energy,creates more
>>> value, is more resilient, and distributes value more broadly.  Anyway, let's
>>> hope so ;)
>>> >>>> Cheers,
>>> >>>> Neal
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> Neal Gorenflo || Publisher, http://shareable.net ||
>>> @ShareableDesign
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 3:28 AM, Alex Rollin <alex.rollin at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> What do you think of when you see this list?
>>> >>>>> Boy Scouts of America
>>> >>>>> Chamber of Commerce / Junior Chamber of Commerce
>>> >>>>> Alcoholics Anonymous
>>> >>>>> Future Farmers of America
>>> >>>>> Rotary International / Rotaract
>>> >>>>> The Freemasons
>>> >>>>> I'm a member of more than 2 of these, myself.  Many of them follow
>>> the bulk of the rules outlined in the Shareable post.
>>> >>>>> I would add churches to the list as well, but I think it's pretty
>>> clear by now that modernity and postmodernity make it rather difficult for
>>> the average human to simply walk into a church, get on with everyone, and
>>> feel well enough at home to contribute to the common good.
>>> >>>>> The future of civic networks will require something that none of
>>> these offer, while still offering everything that these offer (in
>>> another/some form).
>>> >>>>> While in graduate school I spent quite a bit of time researching
>>> civic network protocol.  One place where I spent some time was in churches
>>> doing political organizing...just like Barack Obama...and my teacher was
>>> form the same lineage as Obama's, as a matter of fact.  The idea behind this
>>> was that churches, in America, remain the last standing consumer power base
>>> aggregation point of any worthy note.  It was unfortunate that this was the
>>> case, but it was and still is true all the same.
>>> >>>>> At any rate, my time spent on this line of work was centered around
>>> understanding how small teams of one or two people can quickly facilitate a
>>> self-organizing node in a network (of churches / religious people / people).
>>>  This node, ideally, would be resilient and responsive to the needs of the
>>> community, quickly growing and  iterating to provide for the various needs
>>> of the community with regards to committing themselves further towards the
>>> needs of the members of the network node, all the while staying
>>> action-oriented towards a common superordinate goal.
>>> http://p2pfoundation.net/Superordinate_Goal
>>> >>>>> I spent over 10 years in this variety of organizing, at the
>>> explicitly personal/individual and node, and intra-node.  My now issue of
>>> the past 6 years has more to do with 'network jumping' between networks
>>> created around superordinate goals  Networks of networks of networks of
>>> networks of networks of networks...  Turtles all the way down.  Protocol
>>> every which way.
>>> >>>>> At this moment I am most concerned with the set of principles that
>>> allows us to understand how scale invariance looks, as a protocol, at what
>>> only appears to be different layers.  It's as if we look at the personal,
>>> the node, the intra-node, and we would like to think that there really are
>>> different things happening at each level.  I just don't believe that.  I
>>> know it's not true.
>>> >>>>> The Next civic organizations are built of protocol that allows for
>>> scale invariance.  As above, so below.
>>> >>>>> It's my intention to continue to work on documenting what the heck
>>> that looks like on the P2P Foundation wiki.  Scale invariance for protocol
>>> requires lots and lots of documentation.  Everything that would be true for
>>> a country is true for an individual.  Every principle that holds a people
>>> together is so for individuals.  Each interaction has some anallog at every
>>> level.
>>> >>>>> Alex Rollin
>>> >>>>> http://alexrollin.com
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Gary Myers <
>>> garymyers222 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> What is your best example of a civic network?
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> ________________________________
>>> >>>>>> From: Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>> To: Alex Rollin <alex.rollin at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>> Cc: Gary Myers <garymyers222 at yahoo.com>
>>> >>>>>> Sent: Sun, May 30, 2010 12:34:22 PM
>>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Fw: babysitting coop as civic network
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> dear alex, here are the 20 rules:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 1. Should be engaged in a perpetual campaign to improve the
>>> quality of life on the ground. Must be rooted in local communities unified
>>> by a common vision that everyone can work toward. They must create a
>>> narrative that is open for users to dialog with that guides action and gives
>>> purpose.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 2. Must help individuals self-assess, self-author their lives,
>>> fully express their passions in the community, and become leaders in the
>>> field of their choice, however obscure. The network should give users the
>>> opportunity to:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> * Know their strengths and passions
>>> >>>>>> * Help others according to strengths and passions
>>> >>>>>> * Develop projects aligned with their beliefs, strenghts and
>>> passions
>>> >>>>>> * Invite others to help them with their projects
>>> >>>>>> * Become leaders by doing the above
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 3. Must cultivate moderators at each level of the network
>>> (inter-household, neighborhood, community) willing to promote, moderate,
>>> grow and manage the community.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 4. Must offer a wide variety of services that enable citizens to
>>> self-organize to meet their needs. To get a critical mass of participation
>>> at the local level, civic networks will have to offer a wide range of
>>> services. Like Facebook, the civic network will be a platform for
>>> applications. The only difference is that civic applications are focused on
>>> increasing quality of life rather wasting users time.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 5. Must create a culture of cooperation through such things as:
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> * Personal profiles that inventory an individuals skills, talents,
>>> experience, knowledge, goals, and projects and invite collaboration
>>> >>>>>> * Create norms for cooperation, trust, and social connections
>>> through soft (culture-based) and hard (software-based) methods
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 6. Cooperation must follow a developmental path from simple, easy,
>>> low trust collaborations like exchanging information to more complex, more
>>> difficult, higher trust activities like cooperative childcare, artistic
>>> collaborations, and asset sharing.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 7. Must make visible human and physical assets of the network. An
>>> asset map better allows users and the community to mobilize resources to
>>> achieve goals.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 8. Must connect individuals and organizations in the network in a
>>> system of explicit interdependence and mutual benefit. This means that every
>>> entity knows not only what they will get but how the community will benefit
>>> as a whole by participating. Ideally, each entity gets something they
>>> desperately need.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 9. Must show immediate benefit to individuals and institutions
>>> while working toward larger long-term benefits.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 10. Must make it a meaningful infinite game. The network must
>>> measure and reward individual and network progress toward vision with
>>> intrinsic rewards making everyone feel a part of a larger story of ongoing
>>> success with no limit on the rewards.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 11. Must make it a fun finite game. The network must create
>>> constructive competitions rewarding those who contribute the most to the
>>> network with time limits, scorekeeping, and extrinsic rewards (that
>>> hopefully feedback into the community, no ipod contests!).
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 12. Must give back any profits to the community in a systematic,
>>> predictable, and transparent manner. The recipients of donations must be
>>> democratically determined by a disinterested third party (i.e.community
>>> foundation or community development corporation) or by members.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 13. Must give every member a chance to become a leader, steward or
>>> evangelists for the network and systematically cultivate leadership so there
>>> is a stable pipeline of talent. Then connect the leaders.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 14. The progress of the network must be reported on regularly to
>>> create a positive feedback loop. News flow must emphasize success stories,
>>> report on progress toward vision, profile network role models, how tos,
>>> report on network assets, and demonstrate the power of cooperation.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 15. The service must shape a socially constructive identity for
>>> users to dialog with. Users must be given a role to play out in a story told
>>> by the interplay between system and user. The system must activate the
>>> heroic archetype in users.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 16. The brand of the network must be a user-supported call to
>>> action. The brand must be inclusive, co-created, and experiential. The brand
>>> must have a civic architecture.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 17. Must have a charter detailing the norms of the network, norms
>>> which help ensure fidelity to the purpose of the network.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 18. Real, open, and owned identity. The network must incorporate
>>> trust systems that verify identity. Must support open ID (portable
>>> profiles). Users’ personal and usage data must be controlled by users. Only
>>> users can determine the privacy policy.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 19. Users rule, literally. The network must be user owned,
>>> managed, and governed by users for the benefit of users in a completely
>>> transparent manner.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> 20. Quality over quantity. The goal of the network is to cultivate
>>> leadership in members, not just get members at any cost. While consumer
>>> culture creates consumers, this system creates citizens. The way to create
>>> citizens is to create quality leadership development experiences,
>>> experiences that are life-changing. For instance, the opportunity to
>>> co-manage a babysitting coop organized online could be a life-transforming
>>> leadership development experience.”
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Alex Rollin <
>>> alex.rollin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I spent some time in China...I can see where this person is going
>>> with the Civic Network.  Can you pass along the "20 qualities of a civic
>>> network?'  I'd like to see that.
>>> >>>>>>> I am working on a set of documents for supporting highly open
>>> non-privateering cooperatives.  I'm also putting heavy emphasis on 'civic'
>>> preservation of capital operating assets, ie 500 year horizon.  I'm
>>> reorganizing the p2p wiki pages now to support an interlocking system of
>>> small cooperatives functioning to out-coordinate local private enterprise.
>>>  I am making these notes and linking pages to
>>> http://p2pfoundation.net/Cooperative_Ecology_Project.  There's plenty of
>>> room for others to help in the endeavor.
>>> >>>>>>> Are you the person behind the accounting system on the
>>> babysitting site?  I've been rolling around a few ideas for custom solutions
>>> to other niches where coordination is outsourced to for-profit companies,
>>> but where the work itself is basically simple accounting and compliance
>>> related tasks.  I've not had yet enough time to put together a perfect storm
>>> assay of all the qualities that will make these 'edge' opportunities easily
>>> identifiable, but they certainly exist, and coops with not-for-loss
>>> perspectives will have the best chance of building trust with 'markets'
>>> where the choice between one offering and another is rarely about money.
>>> >>>>>>> A
>>> >>>>>>> http://alexrollin.com/
>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Gary Myers <
>>> garymyers222 at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> See below...thanks for your help.  What more can we do to get
>>> more momentum on these tompics?
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> ----- Forwarded Message ----
>>> >>>>>>>> From: Gary Myers <garymyers222 at yahoo.com>
>>> >>>>>>>> To: Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>; Samuel Rose <
>>> samuel.rose at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>>>> Sent: Sun, May 30, 2010 11:21:55 AM
>>> >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: babysitting coop as civic network
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you for your interest babysittingcoop.com as an example
>>> of a civic network enhanced by a money-free computer assisted barter
>>> system.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I have attached a sample thesis I just mailed to a grad student
>>> in China. I am looking for help!
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> ________________________________
>>> >>>>>>>> From: Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>
>>> >>>>>>>> To: Peer-To-Peer Research List <p2presearch at listcultures.org>
>>> >>>>>>>> Cc: Samuel Rose <samuel.rose at gmail.com>; garymyers222 at yahoo.com
>>> >>>>>>>> Sent: Sun, May 30, 2010 9:41:20 AM
>>> >>>>>>>> Subject: babysitting coop request
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> comment via
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Gary Myers
>>> >>>>>>>> babysittingcoop.com
>>> >>>>>>>> garymyers222 at yahoo.com
>>> >>>>>>>> 67.185.50.144
>>> >>>>>>>> Submitted on 2010/05/29 at 5:36pm
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I have been looking for this kind of guideline for building a
>>> community. I invite you to help me build your vision with all the members of
>>> babysittingcoop.com
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> These moms are re-inventing the idea of neighborhood. It is
>>> really amazing to see the strength of the support for each other that grows
>>> once the co-op gets started…the makings of a good masters thesis…
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> I am looking for anyone that wants to make a small bit of
>>> history in building a community like envisioned in this article.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> In another application of the twenty rules, the BP spill site
>>> has 96,000 technical suggestions sent in. A good civic community could self
>>> organize and allow people to step into a variety of roles needed to review
>>> filter and screen this massive number of suggestions. Who knows a very good
>>> idea may be buried in those 96,000 emails.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net/  -
>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net/
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/; Discuss:
>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens;
>>> http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens;
>>> http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Think tank:
>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens;
>>> http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens; http://twitter.com/mbauwens;
>>> http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Think tank:
>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
>>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Think tank:
>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
>>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>> >
>>> > Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>> >
>>> > Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
>>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>> >
>>> > Think tank:
>>> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>  P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  -
>> http://blog.p2pfoundation.net
>>
>> Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>
>> Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
>> http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens
>>
>> Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100605/9266cb9b/attachment-0001.html>