[p2p-research] Bonds VS Bills for P2P Money

Alex Rollin alex.rollin at gmail.com
Sat Jul 17 00:27:36 CEST 2010


You mentioned you were interested in Unitization.  This is great for
asset-backed value.

It seems to be a growing trend.  How is the research going?

http://opencapital.net/unitisation.htm

http://p2pfoundation.net/Direct_Finance

http://www.slideshare.net/ChrisJCook/equity-shares-a-solution-to-the-credit-crash-presentation

I wonder how this concept could be better understood as a P2P Currency.

A

On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:06 AM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thomas Edison wrote:
>> If our Nation can issue a dollar bond,
>> it can issue a dollar bill.
>
>> The element that makes the bond good
>> also makes the bill good.
>
>> The difference between the bond and the bill
>> lets money brokers [bankers] collect twice
>> the amount of the bond plus interest.
>
>> Whereas the bill [currency] pays nobody but those
>> who contribute directly in some useful way.
>
>> The People are the basis for government credit.
>> Why then cannot the People have the benefit of their
>> own credit by receiving non-interest bearing currency,
>> instead of bankers receiving the People's credit
>> in interest bearing bonds?
>
>> It is absurd to say that our country can issue 30 million
>> dollars in bonds and not 30 million dollars in currency!
>
>> Both are promises to pay; but one promise fattens
>> the usurers and the other helps the People!
>
>
> Will P2P Money be borrowed from debtors or created by peers?
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>



More information about the p2presearch mailing list