[p2p-research] Profit Measures the Payer's lack of Physical Source Ownership

[Patrick Anderson]

A potential Consumer will pay a Price above Cost when he does not have
sufficient ownership in the Means of Production because he is
*dependent* upon those current owners.

This imbalance can be incrementally corrected by treating that
overpayment as the payer's investment in the growth of that
organization so that Capital is no longer 'accumulated' into the hands
of the few, but is transparently 'distributed' back to the very person
who paid it as a deed of property ownership in more Physical Sources
needed for that type of product. It is a subtly 'forced' investment.

This causes profit to approach zero (as price approaches cost) and
control to be move to the hands of those willing to work instead of
being centralized into the hands the payees who treat profit as a
reward for themselves.

Treating profit as a reward for the current owners is the physical
basis of Usury.

Treating profit as an investment from the payer is a negative-feedback
against primitive accumulation allowing growth that is both sufficient
(according to the amount the consumer is willing to overpay) and
autoleveling (because profit==0 when an Object consumer has sufficient
Source ownership).