[p2p-research] really interesting take on the iPad

[Andy Robinson]

Becoming a cult doesn't work?  Why not?  It worked for the world bank.
http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=dSubR-CeeNwC&dq=george+sabelli&source=bl&ots=5BuFjtShmD&sig=7lca2hZcGtiPRV3iHIq15msyN24&hl=en&ei=FfBpS4XgAYr80wTMmb2mCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CCIQ6AEwCQ

Speaking of copyright and cults...
http://atheism.about.com/od/scientology/ig/Anonymous-Protest--Scientology.--Vq/Scientology-s-Lawsuits.htm
Oh no, nothing wrong with IP there, it's really bad for the cults...


On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 6:10 PM, Ryan Lanham <rlanham1963 at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2/3/10, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> which calls the open advocates 'reactionaries' and 'puritans',
>>
>> see http://blog.echovar.com/?p=2449
>>
>> Would be swell if someone could engage with his points for the p2p blog,
>>
>> Michel
>
>
> It is obviously very close to the arguments I make about
> religiousness/politics of P2P or open.  I couldn't agree more.  Rather than
> being compelling, people want their way to be a cult.  Doesn't and shouldn't
> work that way.  In any case, it won't work that way...which is more
> important than the other (doesn't and shouldn't) by far.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100203/04d31442/attachment.html>