[p2p-research] Tyranny of Majority was "Why do we not choose Permaculture?"

[Michel Bauwens]

HI Alex,

I don't think this is a simple situation with a simple response,

I still see citizenship as a step forward,

the important issue is that not all communities are enligthened and national
laws and international treaties set minimum standards ... would  you accept
that in your country some fundamental community re-introduces stoning for
adultery, or would condemn to death same-sex couples belonging to its
religious jurisdiction?

so it necessary needs to a mix of different levels, not simple tailored
legislation,

Michel

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Alex Rollin <alex.rollin at gmail.com> wrote:

> I wonder how "quality of life" can be handled at all by majority rule.  It
> may not be possible.
>
> I know I would prefer to have more granular control over laws and rules
> that effect me.
>
> I recollect the arguments that say that if we don't care, as a people
> (majority, all of us, you included) for those who can't care for themselves,
> then what kind of people are we?
>
> This argument has been stretched pretty thinly as the banks are now the
> poorest amongst us, pillars of capitalism that they are, and our majority
> opinion doesn't count for much when it goes against what the elected
> representatives say is right.
>
> How can standards for the care of children of activities that effect our
> mutual environment be governed, then?
>
> I have enjoyed the idea of "bioregions" like watersheds as a beginning type
> of governance area or jurisdiction, but much can be said about the kind and
> quality of law or regulation that is passed and how it is enacted when it is
> designed to improve or secure a potential lifestyle that has an impact on
> others.
>
> A
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I am trying to find out why our species has decided to move so very
>> far away from local sufficiency toward a dangerous dependecy upon
>> centralized production.
>>
>> We have the Land, Water and willing Workers, so what is the problem?
>>
>> Why don't we grow Almonds, Avocados and Olives, in our cities (where
>> climates allow)?
>>
>> Why are there not grape vines, berry bushes and spice plants in all
>> the places we installed unproductive species?
>>
>> I think there are some logistic problems we have overlooked and am
>> trying to enumerate them so each can be addressed.
>>
>> Please respond if any sound wrong or to add those that are missing.
>>
>>
>>
>> * GOVERNMENTS
>>
>> 1.) Taxation as our system of funding public works requires everyone
>> in that jurisdiction pay for every project even if they are not
>> interested.  It is the primary cause of the "Tyranny of the Majority".
>>
>> 2.) There are social mores against governments being truly productive.
>>  Some may think food should be a public service, but those with enough
>> would not agree - mostly because of problem #1.
>>
>> 3.) Even if a government were to attempt permaculture, the
>> representatives would likely not see the benefits of owning the
>> equipment and hiring the workers, and so would hire a private business
>> to do the work anyway - and so we, the taxpayers who funded the
>> project would likely be required to *buy* the products back from
>> ourselves thereby being exposed to paying profit to those owners and
>> would also loose the high-level control such as if subgroups wanted to
>> avoid herbicides/pesticides, etc.
>>
>>
>>
>> * BUSINESSES
>>
>> 1.) Most businesses view everything in terms of Profit, so would not
>> care about increasing local resilience but would instead weigh the
>> decision on how much they could overcharge the customer.
>>
>> 2.) The question would viewed as a choice as to whether the business
>> should increase their diversity.  Most owners would likely find it a
>> silly proposition as they see agriculture as a strictly separate
>> occupation that has nothing to do with their core goals.
>>
>>
>>
>> * INDIVIDUALS
>>
>> 1.) The owner does not have the time and skill to maintain these more
>> sensitive organisms and the complex ecosystem they should enjoy.
>>
>> 2.) The owner does not have the time and skill and equipment to
>> harvest, process and store those products.
>>
>> 3.) There is usually "too much" of each of those products for a single
>> owner, and so much of the harvest goes to waste, causing logistic
>> problems of 'mess' and also some psychological trauma.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2presearch mailing list
>> p2presearch at listcultures.org
>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>
>


-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens

Think tank: http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20100801/316cca34/attachment.html>