[p2p-research] Pre-Workshop Questions: An Inquiry for a More Fruitful Workshop
Nathan Cravens
knuggy at gmail.com
Sun Sep 6 13:02:25 CEST 2009
Dear Presenters & Developers,
This is an open space. This part is a more specific open structure within
the open space. If this does not interest you, but rather explore another
area that does, or know of a better way we might better prepare for the
workshop, please present that to this space as a new topic. Answering or
adding to these questions will help others get to know you and better
understand what we discuss and develop before and after the workshop.
What would you like to achieve from the workshop?
Nathan Cravens:
- A text document with a collection of methods used to incite
collaboration
- A listing of useful collaborative or communications platforms like
facebook, twitter, Tent, IRC, Skype, ect
- A roadmap describing how we integrate social collaboration and open
manufacturing theories into a single platform, enabling better practices.
- A determination of funding sources that may benefit from the open
source integrated communications product we develop.
- I'm seeking a fun time and lasting friendships
What is your study or development about?
Nathan Cravens:
- I am researching to develop the foundational assumptions for an
integrated platform and the platform itself that can meet all human needs.
No less.
- This means I often get stuck with my head in the clouds exploring a
variety of theoretical abstractions. You help me keep my feet on the ground.
Thank you.
- I look forward to working with you to better ground those views into a
viable platform.
- I am preparing to present 'Remote Self Assembly or Full Automation -
Will Material Abundance End Collaboration?' if I am able to properly develop
the presentation and if we have time. In the event this is not properly
developed in time or we do not have time to explore this area, or for
whatever reason or not, see the working draft of that document anyway:
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATsf-IaJ1pQxZGcyanpkZnRfMzEyZDNtcHMzZ2o&hl=en
- I will write an abstract for this subject area once that work is
presentable.
How might my work be compatible with yours to construct this "Facebook" or
"Google" "on crack?"
*Workshop Questions as PreWorkshop Questions* *for a More Productive
Workshop*
Workshop questions originally intended to ask presenters and panelist can be
answered here before the workshop. These answers will then be presented and
properly cited at the workshop as we explore the area of interest these
questions and answers address.
*Panel 1. Social Collaboration Theory and Platform. *
Presenter Questions
Note: Questions written by Michel Bauwens with additions by Nathan Cravens
- In as few words possible, what best inspires collaborative activity? What
is your group's "secret sauce?"
- What is lacking in present collaboration platforms?
- What is the critique of existing corporate alternatives?
- What are the underlying principles and building blocks of your own
project?
- Status: what has been achieved so far? At what rate are goals achieved?
Describe what worked in your best experiences.
- If possible: little mock-up of how it should look like as is or when
finished?
- What is still crucial for future developments, what are the next steps?
- Knowing what you do of other projects, where do you see collaboration
can occur, and what would be the priorities within a context for
collaboration?
Nathan: Forgive me for not answering the above questions. My angle is more
one of open manufacturing.
Wrap-up
- Once all projects are presented, there should be a process for finding
synergies. Facilitator: Sofia Bustamante
- Followed by a five minute conclusion by each
Nathan: We can do this in some way on our discussion list.
Inspired by Michel's inquiry, I wrote the following panel questions:
Panel Questions
- In as few words possible, what have we determined best inspires
collaborative activity? What contributes to the "secret sauce?"
- What basic platform functions are required to secure what we've learned
of optimal collaboration?
- What standards can we agree on? Where is the text document link we can
collaboratively write, spelling it out?
- What do we call this open and adaptive collaborative organizationally
transcendent platform we develop together?
- OpenKollab
*Panel 2. Open Manufacturing Theory and Platform.*
Presenter Questions
Nathan: I will answer these in terms of 'Remote Self Assembly'. (
http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATsf-IaJ1pQxZGcyanpkZnRfMzEyZDNtcHMzZ2o&hl=en)
You will be asked to answer these questions in the context of your own work.
We will work together as a group to combine the best of our ideas from both
panels to form an integrated platform
- In addition to your work, what is needed to have open manufacturing,
generally?
- Nathan: A few pointers that come to mind are: transparency and
adequate representations of knowledge. I address the need for
cross-compatibility of various software and hardware standards in posing
advancements in remote control by self assembly; a template that
will act as
"water cooler" project I hope might apply to and further advance many
different developmental works; including works indirectly related to the
presentation described in that document.
- What is the critique of existing state and corporate alternatives?
- Nathan: Business stakeholders must become more aware of how
technology affects economic activity, and the disadvantages this
causes paid
work, which in turn diminishes the need for exchange trade. In turn, the
state will have less ability to tax individuals or business in
maintaining
costly state services like public transport or neocolonialism. The
alternatives under development must address these existing failures; and
that business and state are themselves instigators of failure as
reductive
economy dictates--with all due respect.
- What are the underlying principles and building blocks of your own
project?
- Nathan: The belief that full disclosure makes for a better
individual and something more deserving of the term: community.
- Status: what has been achieved so far? At what rate are goals
achieved? Describe what worked in your best experiences.
- Nathan: My work is mostly theoretical today; the practical outcomes
are forthcoming with rates of goal achievement as yet determined.
- If possible: what might it look like like in practice?
- Nathan: Pretty spiffy. I will insist a more descriptive answer from
you! ;p
- What is still crucial for future developments; what are the next
steps; what amount of time (days, months, years) to achieve them with a
defined amount and quality* *of developers and resources?
- Nathan: If this group comes to a consensus that the demonstration
expressed is a good idea; just off the top; the paper folding
demo could be
in less than a year; the second part in 2-3 years; and the final
demonstration in less than 5 years. Again, without much grounding, I will
side with Gershenfeld and suspect we'll have Star Trek
replicators roughly
20 years from now, *gratis* globally.
- Where might these observations or reflections be applied?
- Nathan: Hackerspaces, Transition Towns, Intentional Communities...
Wrap-up
- Once each project is presented, there should be a process for finding
synergies. Facilitator: Smári McCarthy
- Followed by a five minute conclusion by each
*Panel Questions*
What are the best known solutions or resources to solve the issue of...?
- Water
- Food
- Energy
- Communications
- Manufacturing & Waste
- Housing
- Transport & Distribution
- Urban and Suburban Regeneration
- Education
Nathan: I authored these questions, but now in light of time, and
considering the wide array of information already covering these topics, to
use our limited about of time to answer these questions to any significant
degree would probably be a poor use of our time. It would be best, perhaps,
if we compile a list of links to knowledge resources found on the web for
each topic (like Water, Food, Energy, ect) then explore the 'best of' (which
will likely involve our own work) to determine which options would be best
before discussing these issues at the workshop. I suppose these areas are
not as abstract as my general interests would like; so I am not very
interested in exploring the answers to these areas. I hope that you might.
Now that we've determined the solutions or resources to place our
attention, what standards can we come to consensus on? (This may include
agreeing on more than one standard per category.)
Nathan: Sam, Tav, Eddie, Smári, other software/hardware developers, I hope
you might address standards you intend on presenting so we might come to
some agreement before meeting in person.
How will we manage and distribute resources as they become increasingly
common property, unable to use mechanisms of exchange trade such as wage
labor, barter, or currency?
Nathan:
- Life must be a right. Therefore, the inability to 'earn' a living must
not prevent anyone from living a comfortable life, as our moral duty ensures
everyone, at minimum: access to neutral Internet, the ability to personally
create or possess more than adequate water, food, housing, and protective
clothing with the means to sustain them in a way that nurtures planetary
ecologies and human sincerity.
*Final Questions & Discussion Among Panel 1 & 2 *
- Do social platform standards agree to open manufacturing standards?
What compatibility or interoperable standards are needed?
- What standards have we agree to?
- What standards can we not agree to?
- What standards have we overlooked or need to address later?
- What software code or applications can we use to accelerate our goals?
- What are we now preparing to further develop? What does our roadmap
vision look like?
- Where might we find sources for funding; individuals or organizations
that might benefit from the fruit of our collective works?
Nathan: I was unable to answer these questions, but know those of you can,
so I decided to write them to see if you might.
Yours,
Nathan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090906/d3d45ac4/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the p2presearch
mailing list