[p2p-research] The Non-Corporate Fortune 500

[J. Andrew Rogers]

On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:05 AM, Ryan Lanham <rlanham1963 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Most people also separate for-profit from P2P.


Is it really "profit" if all of the excess revenue is redistributed
back to the customers?  Being a resource-positive (i.e. a successful
and well-functioning) P2P organization is a good thing, irrational
aversions to being resource-positive notwithstanding. A P2P
organization based on intentional capital impoverishment is basically
a pyramid scheme.


-- 
J. Andrew Rogers
realityminer.blogspot.com