[p2p-research] is open source design inferior
Eugen Leitl
eugen at leitl.org
Mon Nov 9 16:22:37 CET 2009
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:09:28AM -0500, Samuel Rose wrote:
> I think this is definitely the case when comparing Debian to Ubuntu,
> for instance. It usually does take a company-style structure and
> intensive iterative labor over time to simplify user interfaces.
Ubuntu is a tradeoff, though. It's getting prettier, but also
more broken. In general Linux is the Windows of Unices, and
Canonical is Linux' Microsoft.
> Although, I don't think that it's a safe assumption that it is
> *required* to have a capitalized company behind simple user interface
> development.
The problem is that FLOSS people and usability don't mix.
At least the current culture doesn't seem to, it might mend
eventually.
Not holding my breath, though.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
More information about the p2presearch
mailing list