[p2p-research] is open source design inferior

Eugen Leitl eugen at leitl.org
Mon Nov 9 16:22:37 CET 2009


On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 10:09:28AM -0500, Samuel Rose wrote:

> I think this is definitely the case when comparing Debian to Ubuntu,
> for instance. It usually does take a company-style structure and
> intensive iterative labor over time to simplify user interfaces.

Ubuntu is a tradeoff, though. It's getting prettier, but also
more broken. In general Linux is the Windows of Unices, and 
Canonical is Linux' Microsoft.
 
> Although, I don't think that it's a safe assumption that it is
> *required* to have a capitalized company behind simple user interface
> development.

The problem is that FLOSS people and usability don't mix.
At least the current culture doesn't seem to, it might mend
eventually.

Not holding my breath, though.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE



More information about the p2presearch mailing list