[p2p-research] is the mind a computer

[Tere Vadén]

> 
> I have no idea what your definition of machine is, but I'm using the
> technically rigorous version. Everything we can conceive of is
> literally a machine.  I suspect it would be a waste of time even
> providing the references (if you cared, you could have done two
> minutes of googling to invalidate your assertion).

Would that include conceived things that implement non-Turing-computable 
functions?

> 
> This game of Humpty Dumpty is not the path to productivity.
>