[p2p-research] Peer Governance of This List

[Ryan Lanham]

Michel,

The overwrought state is a trait of P2P we don't look at with a research
lens.  We all feel we have our mouths on a fire hose trying to drink and
also not drown.  Some try to prettify messages and write with 19th century
care...the sort of skills that got people to academic jobs are not very
suitable to a bim-bam-bing web.  A few mysteriously thrive at all of the
above...Lawrence Lessig, Clay Shirky, for instance...others specialize.

Forums are diverse and cannot be fully monitored.  We are all using google
search bots or similar plus things like Twine, Diigo, Delicious, etc.  Your
links have always been invaluable to me...but then again, I say that, and I
can't decide why they are of value...it is because they help me feel like I
am coping with the firehose a bit better than most.

This always comes with the myriad complaints of too little focus, too much
noise, poor signal to noise ratios, etc.  But people still lurk and sample
in such environments.  I think it has something to do with other things like
obesity in the US...where food choices...good and bad, are everywhere and
omnipresent.  People can't cope with choice and responsibility.

My own theory is that we need to give up participation in a full sense and
become riders on the storm.  I fear it is particularly hard for those who
struggle with English, because the realistic language for most of the
traffic in the world is English and it appears it will be for a long time.
English is a sloppy language that has many very heterodox forms and no good
policing system.

Academics tend to hate all this because they have traditionally advanced
exceedingly careful, even prissy types who play with a sentence for 3
hours.  It's all part of P2P...so much more that isn't understood than what
is...

Ryan Lanham


On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 2:19 AM, Michel Bauwens <michelsub2004 at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Matt,
>
> first of all, thanks for your new page,
> http://p2pfoundation.net/Peer_Production_of_Public_Policy
>
> I realize this list is generating some critiques lately ... but I'm
> personally overwhelmed by maintaining the different resources, mainly the
> blog and the wiki ...
>
> Besides from the that, perhaps I'm still benefitting too much from this
> list .... My experience is the following: all email lists are problematic (I
> have trouble keeping up with all of them I'm subscribing too), and the only
> ones that work better (though they don't interest me much), have paid
> moderators such as the Global Solutions system in India (UN development
> lists). This one  here, our own p2p research list, generates a lot of
> response, is consistently interesting to me, but indeed scares people away
> through its volume ...
>
> I'm also weary of adding governance processes when they are not needed 'in
> the moment'. For example, I proposed the due process for Marc as a solution
> to the particular issue, which then could become 'case precedent' material
> in future occasions, but since he did not want to use it, the issue has
> become moot, for now
>
> Another more general issue: for about 3 years, almost every thing we've
> done around p2p-f ws pretty harmonious and constructive; then about 6 weeks
> ago, I got confronted with Stefan's outbursts on Oekonux, then really
> hostile reactions on Znet, and now here Marc's issue. Are these
> coincidences, signs that things are going wrong, or in the best
> interpretation, actually a sign of growth and maturation, a signpost that
> our influence is growing, but therefore also generating more opposition?
> Sometimes I wonder if the issue is not personal, and that perhaps I'm
> unaware of a change in myself, as I have to deal with much more difficult
> life circumstances, now that I had to separate from my warm family
> environment in order to work and feed my family? I don't think so myself,
> but who knows?
>
> I'd be happy to receive any feedback on the recent spates in conflicts as
> well, beyond thinking about any supplementary governance that would be
> needed?
>
> Bear in mind that any supplementary governance needs people to carry it
> out,
>
> Michel
>
>
> On 5/24/09, Matt Cooperrider <mattcooperrider at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello P2P List,
>>
>> I followed the recent netiquette dispute somewhat.  For my part, I have
>> had trouble keeping up with the list, mainly because it takes so much extra
>> mental effort to draw out the discussions I am interested in from everything
>> else.  I thought about some technical solutions to improve the situation,
>> but I realized that any such move would need to have buy-in from the group
>> to be successful.  That made me think, more generally, that we have a
>> commons here that we could be more actively governing to our mutual
>> benefit.  At the very least it's an opportunity to theorize together in a
>> contained setting that we know intimately.
>>
>> Anyone want to take a stab at framing the discussion?
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> --
>> http://mudball.net - get your awesome out
>> http://mattcoop.com - about me
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2presearch mailing list
>> p2presearch at listcultures.org
>> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Working at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University -
> http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html -
> http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI
>
> Volunteering at the P2P Foundation:
> http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net -
> http://p2pfoundation.ning.com
>
> Monitor updates at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens
>
> The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
> http://www.shiftn.com/
> _______________________________________________
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090524/67a6286f/attachment-0001.html>