[p2p-research] p2presearch Digest, Vol 19, Issue 153

[Franz Nahrada]

"Wittel, Andreas" <andreas.wittel at ntu.ac.uk> writes:
>this conversation is as important as it is obviously becoming very
>exhausting to participate. I have two questions:
>1. is there a general feeling that this debate should be organised in a
>more efficient way?
>2. if so, how could we do this?
>Andreas


I think in general it would be good to organize around themes.

I prefer that there are research groups that report or alert in a central
(this) list.

the NING is largely underused and has no real function currently.

Theme groups or research groups should gave constructive goals related to
p2p production. They should look for 3e - evidence, example and experiment.

of course this is "shoulds".

its not really my house ;-) and I am far from having organized mine.

Franz