[p2p-research] Venture Communism or social capitalism

[Dante-Gabryell Monson]

from my current point of view,

property of any individual could ideally be limited to what one uses.
hence not encouraging accumulation,
which possibly adds an incentive for quality ?

example : if I use my computer, I own it.
if I have one old computer I do not use anymore, I am not entitled to its
property anymore.
although I could imagine I could perhaps have a say in the governance of who
makes future use of it ?

but this opens up many more questions.

who has access to the fruit of production capacity ?
consumers of the production ?
who are allowed to be the consumers of production ?

How far stretches the definition of "using" ?

Do I own the processing capacity of my computer that I do not use?
Do I own the hard disk capacity of my computer that I do not use ?

I like Ryan's answer - how do we manage the governance of... the use of
property ?



On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Patrick Anderson <agnucius at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dante-Gabryell Monson wrote:
>
> > What property ideologies best support p2p emergence and sustainability?
>
> Is part of your question the the sub-question of *who* should be the
> owners?
>
> _______________________________________________
> p2presearch mailing list
> p2presearch at listcultures.org
> http://listcultures.org/mailman/listinfo/p2presearch_listcultures.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090502/2663984c/attachment-0001.html>