[p2p-research] Why Post-Capitalism is Rubbish

[Dmytri Kleiner]

It is unfortunate that you respond to Stan's clear question (posed to you
before by myself and others)
with trite fallacies and self-congratulating gibberish.

At it is still based upon individual prices on items and transactions, 
will you explain in which way your system is not a market?


On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 21:54:27 +0200, Christian Siefkes
<christian at siefkes.net> wrote:
> Hi Stan, all,
> 
> Stan Rhodes wrote:
>> Christian, your peerconomy is a market in everything but name.
> 
> Yes, I know. Some people (like you) say it's like a market; some say it
> isn't a market but would evolve into one; some say isn't not a market but
> could never possible work; some say it could work in theory but is
> impossible to reach from where we're now; some (in German) even said it's
> like the classical "socialist" planned economies; some are happy with it.
> That's one of the reasons why I think that I'm really describing
something
> new*: people can't agree in which way to dismiss it ;-)
> 
> *Actually, it's not new and I don't claim it to be -- the commons- and
> pool-based mode of production which I describe is in many ways quite old,
> probably as old as humanity itself. But it has been almost entirely
> forgotten -- that much is changing, however.
> 
> Best regards
> 	Christian
> 
> -- 
> |-------- Dr. Christian Siefkes --------- christian at siefkes.net ---------
> |   Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/   |   Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
> |   Better Bayesian Analysis:           |   Peer Production Everywhere:
> |   http://bart-project.com/            |   http://peerconomy.org/wiki/
> |------------------------------------------ OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --
> I'm afraid Mr. Stallman sometimes sounds like a broken record,
> however I am on his side in the main.
>         -- Michael Hart

-- 
Dmytri Kleiner
editing text files since 1981

http://www.telekommunisten.net