[p2p-research] [Open Manufacturing] Addressing Post-Scarcity Pitfalls

[Michel Bauwens]

Nuclear is a really really bad alternative, it's not economical, it's
depletable, it sets up humanity with a huge and probably unsolvable
pollution problem, and, accidents WILL happen. All it will take is one
accident and the current industry driven hype for huge government subsidies
will disappear again.

Let's focus on renewables and not be sidetracked,

Michel

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 9:31 PM, Ryan Lanham <rlanham1963 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Michel:
>
> The US is a fair model of a future world:
>
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/4e/USEnFlow02-quads.gif
>
> Transportation will decrease, but it will not remain carbon-based.  The
> only serious alternative is electric.  Hydrogen will be a chunk, but not
> much.  Hybrid is a transition technology.
>
> Local consumers in most places cannot access wind or solar in reasonable
> quantities to make personal production realistic or economical.
>
> I think small solar is a 3% at best sort of solution.  Centralized solar
> turning turbines with hot air, etc. is more realistic.  Centralized power is
> needed for industry and transportation and those aren't going away.  Yes,
> there will be efficiencies and savings, but there will also be growth.
> People in the undeveloped world are not going to agree to be poor while the
> West gets to be rich with lights, heat/AC, mobility, shipping, intensive
> mining and mineral use, etc.
>
> Nuclear has a huge future role.  It has to.  People who argue otherwise are
> simply hurting the planet--killing it.  We need power.  Nuclear is going to
> be the main source (period.)  We should fight to minimize it wherever we
> can, but it is the main source.
>
> We need mostly decentralized medium scale distribution grids with medium
> scale production resources that are sustainable and non-carbon.  That means
> hydrogen to me.  Ocean energy can aid, but it isn't a real answer so far.
> OTEC is the obvious vehicle to hydrogen--as is geo-thermal.  Iceland will be
> rich one day when it uses its geo-thermal assets to make liquid hydrogen and
> ship it around the world to hydro plants that fuel small and medium sized
> coastal developments.  Everyone can be rich by building and deploying deep
> ocean OTEC.  The Philippines, Indonesia, Australia, Nigeria,
> Ethiopia/Somalia, India, Central America, the Caribbean--all obvious winners
> with OTEC/hydrogen.
>
> It has been positively criminal that hydrogen and means of production
> haven't been pushed forward more vigorously.  Solar I see as a non-starter
> that will be a minor player--it is too small to produce hydrogen and it is
> too variable to be a realistic developed power source on its own.  The sun
> is the answer, but you need energy storage--warm water gives you that...and
> we've got plenty of it.
>
> Ryan
>



-- 
Working at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University -
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html -
http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI

Volunteering at the P2P Foundation:
http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net -
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com

Monitor updates at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens

The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
http://www.shiftn.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090611/a993472a/attachment.html>