[p2p-research] Fwd: [ox-en] No more [named above] propaganda please

[Michel Bauwens]

Hi Stefan,

I appreciate this mail a lot.

We will work together again, no worries, as I said, time heals ...

Michel

On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Stefan Merten <smerten at oekonux.de> wrote:

> Hi Michel!
>
> I wrote this response earlier but seemingly did not send it to
> [p2p-research] by accident :-( .
>
> Last week (9 days ago) Michel Bauwens wrote:
> > ok, Stefan, let's rest it for a while,
>
> Of course I respect your choice.
>
> > Perhaps in 2-3 months we can discuss and private when the high emotions
> have
> > subsided,
>
> May be it is possible to think about a new perspective, also. More and
> more I think there are grave misunderstandings - though there are also
> some political differences.
>
> > in the meantime, in a community setting, there's lot of small
> > things that will put us in contact and I will try to refrain from saying
> > things that create further strain ...
>
> Very much appreciated.
>
> > Just to summarize, what would have been necessary for me was that you
> > stopped using money trickery in any open dialogue,
>
> This is the most important reason for my mail. See this quote (times
> are from my original post to [ox-en]):
>
> 3 weeks (26 days) ago Michel Bauwens on [ox-en] wrote:
> > A question Stefan, don't you think that your continued usage of money
> > trickery, when people have repeatedly pointed out that it is hurtful and
> > shows a lack of respect for your intellectual sparring partners,
>
> When I saw this I wrote:
>
>  Well, I'm really sorry for this but I really noticed this perception
>  only when you said it here. Then I immediately pointed out why I
>  used this term and that I have no better alternative.
>
>  As you probably can imagine because of the high traffic on [ox-en] -
>  where this all occured - I have a big backlog and I just did not see
>  such comments yet. For instance the quote above being nearly four
>  weeks old I read five minutes ago.
>
>  Looking back the only sign I saw was your question whether "software
>  trickery" would be adequate - which I simply answered as a question.
>
> I even changed it in the subject line (and that was me for whom
> subject lines are holy and only well-defined operations are allowed on
> subject lines...).
>
> Again this whole conflict seems sooo unnecessary...
>
>
>                                                Grüße
>
>                                                Stefan
>



-- 
Working at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University -
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html -
http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI

Volunteering at the P2P Foundation:
http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net -
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com

Monitor updates at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens

The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
http://www.shiftn.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090611/5e9287c4/attachment-0001.html>