[p2p-research] A basic income guarantee versus peer production

Michel Bauwens michelsub2004 at gmail.com
Wed Jul 1 08:32:16 CEST 2009


Hi Andy,

I'm publishing your remarks on the 4th, but do not understand your argument
about 'addition' vs. 'substraction' of arguments ??

Could you elaborate?

Michel

On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Andy Robinson <ldxar1 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think on close examination the capitalist/libertarian types don't
> actually expect capitalism to realise "abundance" as such, since they assume
> insatiability of desires and constant emergence of new marginal utilities
> generating preferences, which ensure that scarcity is part of the "human
> condition".  Rather, they think that a free market leads to the closest
> approximation to abundance by optimising production of goods in relation to
> preferences, managing scarcity so as to generate a maximum (and increasing)
> standard of living.  A small but important distinction.
>
> On even closer examination (see Hirschman's "The Passions and the
> Interests"), what they aim to "maximise" is actually not desire- or
> need-satisfaction but a subtly moralised version of these: the market is
> taken to maximise satisfaction of demands of agents of a particular
> morally-valued type, i.e. instrumental-calculative rational
> possessive-individualists, hence to maximise satisfaction of "interests"
> (not desires, needs, welfare, utility, etc), while requiring that everyone
> produce in response to market pressures.  The resultant economic coercion of
> agency is taken as morally valuable because it helps to produce the correct
> - productive, civilised, hard-working, conformist, Victorian/Protestant -
> kind of human subject.  This becomes clear when they seek to make a case for
> expropriation of indigenous peoples (or to defend the legacy of such
> expropriation), and when they seek to make a case for a right to appropriate
> primary natural "resources" - it becomes clear that the productive are given
> a special moralised privilege to possess for purposes of production, while
> the exclusion of the less-productive or unproductive (by their standards) is
> taken to be morally just, rather than simply economically optimal.  Even the
> argument that the market benefits the poor by trickledown depends on the
> poor conforming to the required type of subjectivity to receive such
> benefits (for instance, by working for others).
>
> As for alliances - as I've said before, I think the key division within
> capitalism is in terms of addition versus subtraction of axioms - and
> peer-production is aligned with the addition of axioms side, though its
> addition usually involves recuperation and domestication.  Paradoxically,
> addition of axioms appears both in the libertarian/propertarian opposition
> to tribute-extraction, and in the social-democratic regulation of capitalism
> through the addition of decommodified spaces and expansive inclusion.  The
> closest alliances, however, should be with those groups which are pursuing
> similar strategies in different fields - in particular, between
> peer-production in the virtual and intellectual fields, and subsistence
> economies in relation to basic needs such as food, including rewilding,
> permaculture, indigenous cosmologies, etc.  Difficult alliances given that
> the two are located on opposite sides of a quite antagonistic debate about
> the merits of technology, but necessary especially for the peer-production
> side - a peer-production economy isn't going to work if everyone starves, or
> if there's no way of looking after vulnerable non-producers such as
> children.  The cutting-edge of peer-production is in fields of virtual and
> intellectual production, probably because of the peculiarly appropriate
> conditions, i.e. infinite (and for users, technically simple)
> reproducibility.  The test of its expansivity as a social form is whether it
> can handle the complexities and problems of fields of social life where
> relations are more finite or at least take more nurturing to be abundant.
>
> bw
> Andy
>



-- 
Working at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dhurakij_Pundit_University -
http://www.dpu.ac.th/dpuic/info/Research.html -
http://www.asianforesightinstitute.org/index.php/eng/The-AFI

Volunteering at the P2P Foundation:
http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net -
http://p2pfoundation.ning.com

Monitor updates at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens

The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
http://www.shiftn.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20090701/164f4515/attachment.html>


More information about the p2presearch mailing list