[p2p-research] [P2P Foundation] From Citizendium To Eduzendium

[Michel Bauwens]

Hi Henrik,

correct me if I'm wrong but in free software, it is most usually patches
that are refused, but nobody refuses anybody the right to try ...

so the exclusion would refer to the process to select excellence, which is
vested in unelected, but respected maintainers

the problem with wikipedia is that the deletionist editors have no
legitimacy to judge those articles and usually know less than the people
writing them, so that their biases become limiting factors ...

Michel

On Feb 4, 2008 2:58 PM, Henrik Ingo <henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi> wrote:

> Hi Jon, welcome to the list and for taking this discussion here too:
>
> On Feb 4, 2008 7:40 AM, Jon Awbrey <jawbrey at att.net> wrote:
> > Let me begin with your definition of peer production,
> > even though I remain a little troubled by a nagging
> > sense that some essential element of equality is
> > missing from the mix.
> >
>
> ...
>
> > C. What does it say about the level of voluntary contribution
> >    when there is a very high level of involuntary exclusion?
> >
>
> Just as a side comment to the above: When talking about peer
> production in general, one should not be too keen on seeing any
> equality or egalitarianism in its processes. In fact, the principle of
> "benevolent dictator" and meritocracy explicitly state that some
> leaders of the project will use their own power above other, and those
> leaders are often not elected to their positions in any democratic way
> (and this works very well in Free Software). Exclusion again is a very
> important ingredient to almost any successful Free Software project,
> its users would expect everything but the most high quality
> contributions to be excluded, again nothing wrong there.
>
> The problem with Wikipedia simply seems to be that a growing number of
> people is disagreeing with the actions of its "leadership", that there
> is exclusionism where there shouldn't be, etc. In fact, Wikipedia
> would probably gain from a more explicit, yet still undemocratic
> leadership. Now it seems that the more stubborn one always wins, this
> is a terrible state of affairs. If a "dictatorship" powers where
> clearly given to a small set of leaders, who wouldn't be acting behind
> pseudonyms, it would be better than the current situation.
>
> Even so, the Citizendium model with more rigid and democratic-like
> governing processes is probably a very healthy step at this point, and
> it may well be that for an encyclopedia project it is the right thing
> to do. (Debian is an example from the Free Software world, where a
> demcoratic governance model clearly is the best fit.)
>
> henrik
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> email: henrik.ingo at avoinelama.fi
> tel:   +358-40-5697354
> www:   www.avoinelama.fi/~hingo <http://www.avoinelama.fi/%7Ehingo>
> book:  www.openlife.cc
>



-- 
The P2P Foundation researches, documents and promotes peer to peer
alternatives.

Wiki and Encyclopedia, at http://p2pfoundation.net; Blog, at
http://blog.p2pfoundation.net; Newsletter, at
http://integralvisioning.org/index.php?topic=p2p

Basic essay at http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499; interview at
http://poynder.blogspot.com/2006/09/p2p-very-core-of-world-to-come.html
BEST VIDEO ON P2P:
http://video.google.com.au/videoplay?docid=4549818267592301968&hl=en-AU

KEEP UP TO DATE through our Delicious tags at http://del.icio.us/mbauwens

The work of the P2P Foundation is supported by SHIFTN,
http://www.shiftn.com/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://listcultures.org/pipermail/p2presearch_listcultures.org/attachments/20080204/ef9c7d40/attachment.html