Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QyCpF-0000Mk-67 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.246.101.161; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1QyCpD-0007lP-08 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.2] (dhcp04346.highsouth-resnet.unc.edu [152.23.97.28]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF18DBB4 for ; Tue, 30 Aug 2011 03:07:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Matt Corallo To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 21:09:03 -0400 Message-ID: <1314666543.5889.2.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list X-Headers-End: 1QyCpD-0007lP-08 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Project status X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 01:09:13 -0000 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:10 -0400, Gavin Andresen wrote: > Quick brain dump on a bunch of stuff: > > I'd like to get a 0.4 release out, but am still working on a fix for > the deadlock bugs that the new wallet encryption and/or the CWallet > refactoring caused. My short-term plan is to reduce the number of > locks and make sure they're always acquired in a consistent order. > Longer term, I think reworking the design to be based on > boost::asio and use fewer threads is probably the right thing to do. Hopefully working on something that would help do this now. > > Other things on the 0.4 TODO list: block chain checkpoint (got a PULL > for that, thanks). Updated list of hard-coded seed nodes (nanotube > did that last time). Pieter's dump/import privkey patch. Also my build update pull would be much appreciated. > > After my talk at the conference, Alex Waters approached me about being > the core bitcoin Q/A lead; he'll be working on creating test plans, > keeping on top of the issues list, testing new features, and > suggesting improvements to the code/test/release process. And > whatever else he thinks needs to be done to improve core bitcoin. NICE