Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 584E794D; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:02:01 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (unknown [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B67DA6; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:02:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:a45d:823b:2d27:961c]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0F17638AB224; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:01:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:161015:libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org::FfT7W3u4SZiKzaqz:i6Ru X-Hashcash: 1:25:161015:lightning-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::kc0PbBCmS3QGP9f7:aJS78 X-Hashcash: 1:25:161015:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::scV87pWSAQHRDamw:aSJ61 From: Luke Dashjr To: libbitcoin@lists.dyne.org, "lightning-dev" Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:01:33 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/4.4.21-gentoo; KDE/4.14.24; x86_64; ; ) X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu X-PRIORITY: 2 (High) Priority: urgent MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201610151301.35687.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] BIP 2: BIP process, revised (review please) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 13:02:01 -0000 BIP 2 is currently believed to be a final draft of what will replace BIP 1 in specifying how the entire BIP process works. This Process BIP will require rough consensus from the Bitcoin-dev mailing list to become Active (see BIP 2 for the procedure, which I intend to use for its own activation due to absence of a clear process defined in BIP 1). Therefore, if you have any objections to the new BIP process as specified in BIP 2, please voice your concerns ASAP. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki Thanks for your review, Luke