Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UJRwa-0006wu-8W for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:09:24 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UJRwW-0000uK-O4 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:09:24 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [173.170.142.26]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85A9627A2965; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:09:14 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:09:05 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.7.3-gentoo; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201303231709.07059.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -2.5 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1UJRwW-0000uK-O4 Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Upcoming network event: block v2 lock-in X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:09:24 -0000 On Saturday, March 23, 2013 4:16:19 PM Jeff Garzik wrote: > Users should not be impacted. Some ancient miners will produce > newly-invalid blocks (v1), that will get ignored. The easy solution > is to mine using a recent bitcoind (0.7 or later). If you are a miner > and need help upgrading to v2, ping us on #bitcoin-dev or > bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net. I don't think anyone is mining using bitcoind 0.7 or later? Deepbit is the only pool I know of using bitcoind at all, and it's based on 0.3.21 (or about that)... p2pool has supported v2 blocks since 2012 Aug 8. Eloipool has supported v2 blocks since 2012 Sep 1. slush's stratum server has supported v2 blocks since it was written. I'm not aware of any other maintained open source poolservers. At least PoolServerJ and ecoinpool are known to break when v2 blocks become mandatory.