Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gavinandresen@gmail.com>) id 1UF4lw-0003jX-TA
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:20 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 74.125.82.47 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=74.125.82.47; envelope-from=gavinandresen@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-wg0-f47.google.com; 
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1UF4lr-0006qU-Uo
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:20 +0000
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id dr13so4943075wgb.26
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:36:09 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.43 with SMTP id ez11mr13501935wic.28.1363016168087; 
	Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.157.168 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 08:36:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABOyFfp9Kd+y=SofWfq6TiR4+xeOhFL7VVHWjtrRn83HMsmPBA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20130310043155.GA20020@savin>
	<CABOyFfp9Kd+y=SofWfq6TiR4+xeOhFL7VVHWjtrRn83HMsmPBA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 11:36:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CABsx9T1rt+7BQHz1S=NVtL_YV7kfCapQ+3MEf+xyXT7pZOfq7w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= <jtimonmv@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam-Score: -1.6 (-)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gavinandresen[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1UF4lr-0006qU-Uo
Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Blocking uneconomical UTXO creation
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 15:36:21 -0000

> Just activate a non-proportional demurrage

demurrage of any kind will never, ever happen, just give up on that idea.

The negative publicity of "the bitcoin developers are destroying YOUR
coins!" would be devastating.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen