Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <luke@dashjr.org>) id 1RrwDI-00013R-SA
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:44:24 +0000
X-ACL-Warn: 
Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	id 1RrwDD-0003AK-Af for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:44:24 +0000
Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net
	[184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr)
	by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A8990560716;
	Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:44:13 +0000 (UTC)
From: "Luke-Jr" <luke@dashjr.org>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:44:06 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <20120130180716.261910@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <20120130180716.261910@gmx.net>
X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583
X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583
X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201201301344.08034.luke@dashjr.org>
X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
	domain -0.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
X-Headers-End: 1RrwDD-0003AK-Af
Cc: thomasV1@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 21 (modification BIP 20)
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 18:44:24 -0000

On Monday, January 30, 2012 1:07:16 PM thomasV1@gmx.de wrote:
> I too support BIP21 over BIP20.

BIP 21 is not forwards-compatible, and is intentionally designed to be biased 
toward decimal. BIP 20 is neutrally biased, forward-compatible, and has been 
implemented for over a year now. If BIP 20 is to be Superceded, a proposal 
should improve on it, not make it worse with bigotry and short-sightedness.