Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90178A1 for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:21:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail148161.authsmtp.com (outmail148161.authsmtp.com [62.13.148.161]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E372420C for ; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c247.authsmtp.com (mail-c247.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.247]) by punt24.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u792LXbR082194; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:21:33 +0100 (BST) Received: from petertodd.org (ec2-52-5-185-120.compute-1.amazonaws.com [52.5.185.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id u792LWpi023125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 9 Aug 2016 03:21:32 +0100 (BST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by petertodd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7AC0440104; Tue, 9 Aug 2016 02:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 844732054D; Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:21:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 19:21:29 -0700 From: Peter Todd To: Chris Priest , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: <20160809022129.GB1858@fedora-21-dvm> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Server-Quench: fd5dfd4e-5dd7-11e6-bcde-0015176ca198 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aAdMdgsUGUATAgsB AmAbW1deUlx7WmA7 bghPaBtcak9QXgdq T0pMXVMcUQJhA2Bm RkceUBpzdQAIfXty ZQg0CnUPChB+IFt4 FhpTCGwHMGF9OjNL BV1YdwJRcQRMLU5E Y1gxNiYHcQ5VPz4z GA41ejw8IwAXag9V SwcCLFQdAw4XHjN0 TRQFFjY0HF8IDyEy Kh06Ql4B X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1038:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 52.5.185.120/25 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] *Changing* the blocksize limit X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 02:21:35 -0000 --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 07:15:22AM -0700, Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev wrot= e: > If the blocksize limit is to be changed to a block output limit, the > number the limit is set to should be roughly the amount of outputs > that are found in 1MB blocks today. This way, the change should be The largest output on testnet is a bit under 1MB, and encodes a certain well-known love song... In many circumstances(1) miners have an incentive to create larger blocks t= hat take their competitors longer to receive and validate, so protocol-level bl= ock limits need to take all these potential DoS vectors into account; serialized size is one of the most fundemental things that needs to be limited. > considered non-controversial. I think its silly that some people think > its a good thing to keep usage restricted, but again, it is what it > is. As mentioned above, and explained in detail in my recent blog post(1), restrictions are needed to keep a level playing field between all miners. 1) https://petertodd.org/2016/block-publication-incentives-for-miners --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXqT4mAAoJEGOZARBE6K+yG+EH/1JLQK39wkwg68/UVji/LkAK lmaF9nGkpgEXHBpQNx0pFYMSWCZu380bmBCm/UmOoGOqXjpPszfzfhN+UypUPiAH tbVY8q4jQqtMO2jZMC30AVRdwsp9HjByxATk1sXgYbiCNCrfOQdSwtZaUxb4WP3+ hqte/ZY0cemgC1lgZCbFbnnwKVlizULpDNNsfBubtBlxQ0zsWpf00DDeo0x3L+NY sS2uVeIhNVV9oADy9d1HZeSi1xGbB4G2QuqIbEA3Kms5MVdtSOgOjHpK86NkAt9L WKupIIRw+RnyIhqWMbTAwOBQqQo6u4d1M+bYFsr/0Y24Br6/tT9k7ZgZYbqEbTI= =KweW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/WwmFnJnmDyWGHa4--