Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E534C0037 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54AD6843C0 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org 54AD6843C0 Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=fm3 header.b=ESJx7mGn X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.602 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nCPBzGZjjzBi for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:14 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 603 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at util1.osuosl.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:14 UTC DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp1.osuosl.org BB54083F4F Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB54083F4F for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34FF3200B9B; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:42:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:42:08 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1705599727; x=1705686127; bh=GMxPp4K8wlHGf0XpfqGIkwdRa7Gf NT4vC3ZTl+Be8TY=; b=ESJx7mGnWl37R0kQupT5MkGJskyfobdw7n4ti6zNmhIr HBikodqD3DpvLN+6vGfOKkFp42KwUWXX62LGCj6AOHx9F4RxSvvAV4JDC/j//qpR pHVl8kcqVEw1w9F8HAm8tphZlkbfhfoyxLt7ut7JnCox5ZONEdp2nGa5fPkAwfDU xSDs0Y6m1IZMRIMgJAfUdc5b+CG1nGFsegPMJXs/ViOt8boGxfuWaLCJkavg6WgR fr7N8K/XRe7XyKU9JeLHjP+v0W0cgKBNcjxgwLeHD399A6GY8uRncJDz1xeUihAv sEprmt8PgicmQbJIfzHlvMLxYSYvXmKlwOjSGJ6JJw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdejkedgjeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvvefukfhfgggtuggjsehgtd erredttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrvghtvghrucfvohguugcuoehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhht ohguugdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnheptddtgedtffetueekfffhffekkeeihf etuddvteejueejffegveeghfduteejhfevnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtgho mhdpphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrh grmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpvghtvgesphgvthgvrhhtohguugdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i525146e8:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 12:42:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DFBED5F849; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:42:03 +0000 From: Peter Todd To: alicexbt , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45F2hKp+EY8D/oKx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Anthony Towns Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP process friction X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 17:52:16 -0000 --45F2hKp+EY8D/oKx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 04:47:33PM +0000, alicexbt via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi AJ, >=20 > I like the idea and agree with everything you shared in the email except = one thing: >=20 > > So I'm switching inquisition over to having a dedicated "IANA"-ish > > thing that's independent of BIP process nonsense. It's at: > >=20 > > * https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/binana >=20 > I think "authority" is a strong word especially in bitcoin and this proce= ss could even work with BINN (Bitcoin Inquisition Numbers And Names). IANA = (a function of ICANN) is different thing altogether which was founded by US= government. Bitcoin Inquisition is based on signet, which is a centralized blockchain f= or testing run by a central authority whose consensus is based on signatures f= rom that authority. Using the term "authority" in this context is fine. --=20 https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org --45F2hKp+EY8D/oKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0RcYcKRzsEwFZ3N5Lly11TVRLzcFAmWpYukACgkQLly11TVR Lzd7Fw/9EZwNa9o3pQR7UlU5idXbyzeOmkdhWlZdsJMJNHQHvAQ3C4NcxlmEj9ph v08zfgJTnC2U8CuXO37ZytMRZ+Sx9FvK9DKxLf1u799yneUOSUq6knZ7FHPJc+wC U5qVRJA6GllK9u19nFGvV1fiVSmnq/Ox5I353SGsv3NYTX91ZTz135k+8qTB9qJv rxfEBzMszydtNXEfiMo588aZAVBfCA1lUcXKk34X7my3rfi1D9cDunhj8BZKWti6 HgieCXGrUcQpAdINZ+00a9A+XsvJA92Zfdc3dWB11xScizk8/K0J7/WBkXYseGNo GnXWkgDT+Sd7zZFl+g9PQ+sfXlORLnPDLVDpHKTfKFXHWY4+z8lxVgBKx1RvQGC1 DbgmcOVlAWZy5nZxaSJubFgInqaNUrrYCDP+HJizWksbiMy2Lox6qVkCplR9fhFR ZPrjvVGKfnfZww/c3sPfXEZZPFaXSeo6opDdXHZCtmyvx5wG4zsMGvn7B6zXjZu/ u5k/nR0NHgUIhVidlfYj2VSHzbXMNlupcigQJ5uv45FTpcHAlcP6kHMeUQ96tfYt gCofrlGkIRxp+0Bhz9qKpxJFVDm/fl76MLwXW39GbAI5PjW2tBWOBk6FiBoIome+ d6/Wnyxf8EsdAppI9D2F2iITIwKIYJAYVvj1mdeJi2HGVpL+IHw= =21SV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45F2hKp+EY8D/oKx--