Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6B9CEC for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:32:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f44.google.com (mail-ed1-f44.google.com [209.85.208.44]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33F2D102 for ; Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f44.google.com with SMTP id f38-v6so807956edd.8 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:32:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:mime-version:to:from:subject:date:importance:in-reply-to :references; bh=pAxX+S4HnDrJLacb1lQ4DLy1bTk2aKzQJxrm6dTn2fo=; b=S5QoHqT9CbZAR+rFHpYiLMyP4WxtDGlH5DFcTbtHZDn4KfMqC36J8v8ompeX+IJIaN c/o1YRdjfg0cTz6v5tduX2yoQso8+JrBvqVbfCwTpGQBXz17L2KgeFMypVFb4lQbRcBA Lw5QVagreInWzE8oS2nEBsRpyYcFqwxVNFPxkLKRn9ehRb8wdLKlPzXWqCLDN0MZxs2a JxDjOyYZZqEw9hXHQeqnsFvHcJh4jGqHT7g4QUt+cpdHY3g+zMW/AGmG9vB/FE/XcLwI +lT4eIuVzY8AtqvBUwj3oZrPhuDmg2Ekt2nmsJ0QAlB47JjnzaEeD7k/TsYQdl+Vj3yC YozQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version:to:from:subject:date :importance:in-reply-to:references; bh=pAxX+S4HnDrJLacb1lQ4DLy1bTk2aKzQJxrm6dTn2fo=; b=JSE5ZHS+QPs5bJfB85UrH5yZnfMb8l7FUIpqLAie5QSITwjlotr62BhVtvuA2EekQO o9BCl5jlhUWr7Z/hDp7QLmjkY7twoff+tgQqGrGiPDaBjZRfzIAJYcnkMchdSfTsB9b1 T4za4BR2wqvWSf8qzuAhP0Y9xL/8H5pLH4D3nv263T5TWYwsHuY5hiylk3ZAZkPpfWIF EjksvtMFPNMXZReiOkM6MbozhWKJBrF3IsJQYcj3iYxZLcNSsjSKrRix4Q6wJmAW31sR sk1q+DGJj8XpXmrwKE2qf2tHyhMa1egYL6VOviog94nLHTN22GCjptZ1dTjX59zJ23X5 kLJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51DwGJY0eq3++qp7Wqu8qXd41NauNhFLvZAlN+yMTMpxzOqgQMoa fFxzKqpk4/PD226urkuE+zg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZHnBvsnUJTGi8xwLeUBmEu4Da5X/L/inCzTdM0HPFvM7EN1TeYo4GyHR6s4m1S4uCIl3njEw== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c2cd:: with SMTP id m13-v6mr924155edp.79.1536733928753; Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:192.168.1.45? (0194301123.0.fullrate.ninja. [90.184.161.9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v49-v6sm216623edc.10.2018.09.11.23.32.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Sep 2018 23:32:07 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5b98b2e7.1c69fb81.2a827.102b@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl-Johan Alm , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 08:32:10 +0200 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: References: <5b787d19.1c69fb81.e0628.771a@mx.google.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_6469BF9D-C767-4A2E-8E2B-68873E9A1414_" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 13:39:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 06:32:10 -0000 --_6469BF9D-C767-4A2E-8E2B-68873E9A1414_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A very good point. I have realized the immature nature of my suggestion due= to this and a number of other good remarks, and will like to retract the i= nitial suggestion. =20 Thank you and all the best=20 Martin Damgaard Fra: Karl-Johan Alm Sendt: 12. september 2018 08:14 Til: damgaard.martin@gmail.com; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Emne: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale A potential problem is that it would be a new attack vector to simply color something to appear as e.g. 10x more than it really is, if everyone started using this system. On Sun, Aug 19, 2018 at 5:27 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Hi bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > > Here is my humble attempt to make a contribution to the impressive work t= hat you all are doing. > > I am unfamiliar with the normal BIP procedures. I have therefore just tri= ed to follow the example of BIP 176 by Jimmy Song, in order make something = similar. I suggest a universal bitcoin value color scale, for tackling the = same decimal problem, as identified by the BIP 176 proposal. > > I have attached the document in three different formats (*.rtf, *.pdf and= *.docx) as I do not know your preferred format. I hope you will find my su= ggestion useful. > > > > Thank you and all the best > > Martin Damgaard > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --_6469BF9D-C767-4A2E-8E2B-68873E9A1414_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

A very good point. = I have realized the immature nature of my suggestion due to this and a numb= er of other good remarks, and will like to retract the initial suggestion.<= /span> =C2=A0

Thank you a= nd all the best

Martin Damgaard

 

Fra: Karl-Johan Alm
Sendt: 12. septembe= r 2018 08:14
Til: da= mgaard.martin@gmail.com; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Emne: Re: [bitcoin-dev= ] Suggestion for a universal bitcoin value scale

 

A potential problem is that i= t would be a new attack vector to simply

color some= thing to appear as e.g. 10x more than it really is, if

everyone started using this system.

On Sun, Aug= 19, 2018 at 5:27 AM Martin Damgaard via bitcoin-dev

<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> 

> Hi bitcoin-dev@lists= .linuxfoundation.org

> 

> Here is my humble attempt to make a contribution to th= e impressive work that you all are doing.

>=  

> I am unfamiliar with the normal B= IP procedures. I have therefore just tried to follow the example of BIP 176= by Jimmy Song, in order make something similar. I suggest a universal bitc= oin value color scale, for tackling the same decimal problem, as identified= by the BIP 176 proposal.

> 

=

> I have attached the document in three different f= ormats (*.rtf, *.pdf and *.docx) as I do not know your preferred format. I = hope you will find my suggestion useful.

>&= nbsp;

> 

> 

> Thank you and all= the best

> 

> Martin Damgaard

> 

=

> _______________________________________________

> bitcoin-dev mailing list

> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org

> h= ttps://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

 

= --_6469BF9D-C767-4A2E-8E2B-68873E9A1414_--