Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Rz9zS-0006uy-As for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.210.47 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.47; envelope-from=laanwj@gmail.com; helo=mail-pz0-f47.google.com; Received: from mail-pz0-f47.google.com ([209.85.210.47]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Rz9zR-0005ji-7T for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 +0000 Received: by mail-pz0-f47.google.com with SMTP id n34so5062815dal.34 for ; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of laanwj@gmail.com designates 10.68.135.134 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.135.134; Authentication-Results: mr.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of laanwj@gmail.com designates 10.68.135.134 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=laanwj@gmail.com; dkim=pass header.i=laanwj@gmail.com Received: from mr.google.com ([10.68.135.134]) by 10.68.135.134 with SMTP id ps6mr53550637pbb.66.1329670317017 (num_hops = 1); Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.134 with SMTP id ps6mr44321336pbb.66.1329670316982; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.173.9 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Feb 2012 08:51:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <99923487-B2AA-4313-94F3-E88BA4631366@ceptacle.com> References: <15A9E3BE-3288-4CDC-8243-05669298CDB0@ceptacle.com> <99923487-B2AA-4313-94F3-E88BA4631366@ceptacle.com> Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 17:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: From: Wladimir To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=B8nager?= Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (laanwj[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1Rz9zR-0005ji-7T Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] off-topic: bitcoin-forum... X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2012 16:51:58 -0000 --047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael Gr=C3=B8nager wrote: > Thanks! > > "required 5 posts and 4 hours" > > Well, that is not so easy if you cannot post ;) I will apply for > whitelisting - strange policy though... > It was instated in times that the forums were much more busy. There were a lot of new people that trolled the forum with questions immediately, which were answered throughout the forum already. This policy forces people to hang around the newbie forums a bit before being able to post to the "full" forum. I'm not sure it's really needed anymore -- anyway, it used to be much more strict and you'll have no problems getting whitelisted. Wladimir --047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Michael= Gr=C3=B8nager <gronager@ceptacle.com> wrote:
Thanks!

"required 5 posts and 4 hours"

Well, that is not so easy if you cannot post ;) I will apply for whitelisti= ng - strange policy though...

It was in= stated in times that the forums were much more busy. There were a lot of ne= w people that trolled the forum with questions immediately, which were answ= ered throughout the forum already. This policy forces people to hang around= the newbie forums a bit before being able to post to the "full" = forum. I'm not sure it's really needed anymore -- anyway, it used t= o be much more strict and you'll have no problems getting whitelisted.<= /div>

Wladimir

--047d7b10c7dbe982fd04b953fe2c--