Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WLcm8-0007eq-6C for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:12:08 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.128.170 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.128.170; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com; helo=mail-ve0-f170.google.com; Received: from mail-ve0-f170.google.com ([209.85.128.170]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WLcm7-00076R-FI for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:12:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f170.google.com with SMTP id pa12so3031859veb.15 for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:12:02 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.184.73 with SMTP id es9mr131377vdc.55.1394129522015; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 10:12:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com Received: by 10.52.24.38 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 10:12:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:12:01 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: O5mOciS4HGGpnqKjP-meq9lvN1w Message-ID: From: Mike Hearn To: Brooks Boyd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec548a113ee463104f3f412de X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (mh.in.england[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1WLcm7-00076R-FI Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Instant / contactless payments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 18:12:08 -0000 --bcaec548a113ee463104f3f412de Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > If there was a way for a Bitcoin user to provide feedback on a payment > (ECDSA signature from one of the addresses involved in the payment, signing > an identifier of the payment and a feedback score) > Well now you're getting into the area that I said "rapidly got very complicated". Define bitcoin user? What stops me paying myself to accrue positive reputation? Etc. --bcaec548a113ee463104f3f412de Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
If there was a way for a Bitcoin user to provide feedback on a = payment (ECDSA signature from one of the addresses involved in the payment,= signing an identifier of the payment and a feedback score)

Well now you're getting in= to the area that I said "rapidly got very complicated".

Define bitcoin user? What stops me paying myself to accrue = positive reputation? Etc.
--bcaec548a113ee463104f3f412de--