Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778AFC0011 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55C5C408C4 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.297 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jNzMbjirFg-a for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-40137.protonmail.ch (mail-40137.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.137]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF4C6408B3 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1645434136; bh=8PYPKx65SxikIvNfwbQ+ucSwIaPraq0yCE1r1DFae64=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID:Message-ID; b=oCiRZOGhBFIQRz/VQFvbohIDNWEFVB1Ifurefr5RXxNidLw5qrcjDEsTlsdwXVwot Zpy17sr40ici80t9YDqKsDCGnVEauOwWe020cSoGLv3JlI5fPqD+gGo5S9vliKWJo/ pcZ7u462LVf6uuaWJSir4hnfM4Rmeetl6YTuejFn5LMbbwMU0p5wSTM5BXTH05S2kt J1dLQaBzi47eNMB4rLOjc7ucxa+tvFb7vnFA3xztBVZX730jbVBoNc72Id5NDYwBpz L62Y/OagyvTlNvfDE5BKlv86UDJgcmZ0/bg3RFZNoeuwmCEuZaW2AaHkrU9vHREUhm cp++eFXeZjiCQ== To: Prayank , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: ZmnSCPxj Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Stumbling into a contentious soft fork activation attempt X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 09:02:20 -0000 Good morning Prayank, (offlist) > Satoshi I object to the invocation of Satoshi here, and in general. If Satoshi wants to participate in Bitcoin development today, he can speak = for himself. If Satoshi refuses to participate in Bitcoin development today, who cares w= hat his opinion is? Satoshi is dead, long live Bitcoin. Aside from that, I am otherwise thinking about the various arguments being = presented. Regards, ZmnSCPxj