Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BD0F8E2 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:01:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com (mail-it0-f65.google.com [209.85.214.65]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1E52271 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:01:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f65.google.com with SMTP id c16so11054016itc.5 for ; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:01:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=uqaIADuoQny6YWlVwcr4zZHfLYq2/DgAaUeGatNcB1Y=; b=NTSyni5hLlzjxn4d37JLA/si1MFIg7VSFuwu6wO5Hwyxz43k0WFrsDPaiiTOsM+ayk ygoG0Crd1v2eufeybz8L1BSUtvl6EWr9fil7mJ1X9tsa+50fKcBkAbha+zP1kJg90shv uLao31RwuP3Xw8Vw3/UtVLTmLIdzYSmyJHW2c+vanyGo9MUL62IFij3o3kwfX6otQ4IG yhaB2wCR08Ik/7lCFMYdZIC1dm1ObbZ9i5Ab7JHgDhZfNQ4YAW/kLZQLpmOUpGkFDcDZ 0HOD6vUz6CPuQOWRKYo5GPVZ5aAIJKOHI7U61MCwvvtH/839N9PXu90aJR4Uiy16TfpU VmLQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=uqaIADuoQny6YWlVwcr4zZHfLYq2/DgAaUeGatNcB1Y=; b=FT9Y/cYWpnKwrO/JbstvMA9zGZHzv4fzvPExfAb4vksWRd69xuFS+8PrhpgX7iaHMG mXsfjpouInvuKStP0gsSZnQCYrYdLXKdSFKCHyU24Hr+Qw4uLXQEB1zlCRoCe1kNt0QG MAMccj0SmPK3VhI2svCAU5ES0TJ00kkOL9YlTG3oAsXXm94gQkcLspykjNMH9b7+Icvt zd1E2RdnWJ4WMHZkgdAT1+CL1m0RLSzxl6v06jtEjj2IW5J+LIxw5t4s8C5Tpnv7Lpkw yUQ73csK2cb2yoFz56Oe/5CyN8jcKpaEu9tcUsRgJz/KptBgxKl+E+JHX00JeWvYtkEq Dnwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytdBA2IqM8kSVZLpvHBva9S8vKfNnChzMF1Dv8kM/5d/LUiE8P3a 6lcvyypvS9uybZwc0mcxq4/vNZ+ys3Do0099lBQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224G1bWfuomQTXU3OyZUladl6gL63PdsXF+vS0pxgDZgfHYxiNqnKwSsoaA5LVVSMsOM14PWQ0GtcUufhFP5Psc= X-Received: by 10.36.94.140 with SMTP id h134mr9851494itb.150.1516647663119; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:01:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.2.153.115 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.2.153.115 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 11:01:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ilan Oh Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 20:01:02 +0100 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114253f035b2920563620d4c" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:03:03 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Blockchain Voluntary Fork (Split) Proposal (Chaofan Li) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:01:04 -0000 --001a114253f035b2920563620d4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" How do you handle the mining on each chain ? The chain with the most mining power will tend to have more value. Also blocks are not mined equally and 1 chain will be longer than the other thus faster thus more valuable. It seems to be a sidechain proposal with the exact same protocol. --001a114253f035b2920563620d4c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
How do you handle the mining on each chain ?

The chain with the most mining power will = tend to have more value.

Also blocks are not mined equally and 1 chain will be longer than the othe= r thus faster thus more valuable.

It seems to be a sidechain proposal with the exact same protocol.= =C2=A0
--001a114253f035b2920563620d4c--