Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <etotheipi@gmail.com>) id 1YDIYA-0000do-P1
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.216.173 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.216.173; envelope-from=etotheipi@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-qc0-f173.google.com; 
Received: from mail-qc0-f173.google.com ([209.85.216.173])
	by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1YDIY9-0001ds-OG
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 +0000
Received: by mail-qc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id m20so16753792qcx.4
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.140.98.225 with SMTP id o88mr38441338qge.5.1421697824324;
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.28] (c-69-143-204-74.hsd1.md.comcast.net.
	[69.143.204.74]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
	v16sm13175987qaw.30.2015.01.19.12.03.40
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
	Mon, 19 Jan 2015 12:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54BD6314.60607@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 15:03:32 -0500
From: Alan Reiner <etotheipi@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64;
	rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAN5esQJe0uUm0NyctaBa6WH7_JjeE_OLR=FY_XQWnSr50VRDyA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAJHLa0OTynX4oiQoyanpRKE2tpAuS4L5X-2j20328725J9RrvQ@mail.gmail.com>	<2C7D6208-1921-4DDC-90FE-DB1ABE1D61DB@petertodd.org>
	<CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="------------060407000803050905050006"
X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(etotheipi[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1YDIY9-0001ds-OG
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70: why Google Protocol Buffers for
 encoding?
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:03:50 -0000

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------060407000803050905050006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm a bit confused.  It's been a long time since I looked at protobuf
(and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall it doesn't
have any of the determinism properties you guys just said.  It is
intended to allow you to skip details of the on-the-wire representations
and just send a bunch of named fields between systems.  I thought there
was no guarantee that two identical protobuf structures will get
serialized identically...?




On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady wrote:
> Thanks guys, great answers. 
>
> The design choice certainly makes a lot more sense now regardless of
> whether one agrees with it or not.
>
> Regards,
> Richard
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
> GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
> Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
> Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


--------------060407000803050905050006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    I'm a bit confused.� It's been a long time since I looked at
    protobuf (and will have to dig into it soon), but I seem to recall
    it doesn't have any of the determinism properties you guys just
    said.� It is intended to allow you to skip details of the
    on-the-wire representations and just send a bunch of named fields
    between systems.� I thought there was no guarantee that two
    identical protobuf structures will get serialized identically...?<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01/19/2015 02:57 PM, Richard Brady
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAN5esQLCV=L0kYxDGhK2F=qZ8OqMxyYS+-Pn17U_M+nV4Sj3Og@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div>
            <div class="gmail_signature">Thanks guys, great answers.�</div>
            <div class="gmail_signature"><br>
            </div>
            <div class="gmail_signature">The design choice certainly
              makes a lot more sense now regardless of whether one
              agrees with it or not.</div>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_signature"><br>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_signature">Regards,</div>
          <div class="gmail_signature">Richard</div>
          <br>
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">------------------------------------------------------------------------------
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn.
Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet">http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet</a></pre>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------060407000803050905050006--