Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RgYMC-0006TY-UN for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:02:32 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bluematt.me designates 173.246.101.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=173.246.101.161; envelope-from=bitcoin-list@bluematt.me; helo=mail.bluematt.me; Received: from vps.bluematt.me ([173.246.101.161] helo=mail.bluematt.me) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RgYMB-0004tC-US for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:02:32 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.14] (c-24-4-11-52.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.4.11.52]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EC0143F8 for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:55:57 +0100 (CET) From: Matt Corallo To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <1325235436.4059.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1325235436.4059.YahooMailNeo@web121006.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 01:02:22 -0800 Message-ID: <1325235742.2976.0.camel@BMThinkPad.lan.bluematt.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -1.3 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RgYMB-0004tC-US Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] upnp isnt working X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 09:02:33 -0000 On Fri, 2011-12-30 at 00:57 -0800, Amir Taaki wrote: > hey, > > so sipa/gmaxwell proposed on irc that maybe upnp is not working anymore but there isnt any way to test. > > well i made an alternate chain, and ran the daemon on my vps. > > sometimes it accepts connections, sometimes not. It's all very patchy. > > anyway just putting this out there I believe the issue isn't lack of working, but lack of re announcing to the router that the port needs to remain open. Matt