Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WTAu6-0008Ee-KX for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ee0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1WTAu5-0002Q8-5I for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id c41so2879976eek.22 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=mZIWbp+eutnVRGQ6ZMpwSHgx8FEHjqn2s86JRNzoqMw=; b=Nz1SIEp/N+e4Yi5UnSRxfN5QgV1krIzT5C028H+xyPuW1k2Onn5bm6Fxw+2P52u+L7 8RJKfkxml05C0os6Ni0pWeNJPLmo1sVpi8cllUyksgWNNgBpiKXFSLhqLkT/Ps2sxi9t h7LRiv/nQp/9TgkKR57GCDoXoGEhg4SQ2u4kRQ6Zvx1KukxVrvo1KiQXhd3OS2+PwMc4 A59f14uCQW498RMrtM02mGAXRXudj/QOnkc9CJWLYXqOFcyY89WQ9VeNF7mFg6xBrqkB g4BXkEiyYOngD/uokF0SQhK2tNRh5C9dzAmmvyQd04opULfABZdPQ78BKAm2zv/xHdNX yysw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnPYPFMvOE9fBI8UvSZgyW+46x7RLWT2p/zj5bTNNLHHd7K+96V9a1U5bWLm4jAwwWy/bjJ X-Received: by 10.14.87.7 with SMTP id x7mr1939284eee.44.1395929006732; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tetra.site (nat-0-15.lam.cz. [80.92.242.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id y7sm4598875eev.5.2014.03.27.07.03.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 07:03:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <53342FAB.6040803@gk2.sk> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:03:23 +0100 From: Pavol Rusnak User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Voegtlin , Bitcoin Development References: <53340999.807@gmx.de> <5334144A.9040600@gmx.de> <53342B3E.3050404@gk2.sk> <53342D5F.7090309@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <53342D5F.7090309@gmx.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1WTAu5-0002Q8-5I Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 14:03:34 -0000 On 03/27/2014 02:53 PM, Thomas Voegtlin wrote: > Note: Maybe we could just look at the first address of each account, > instead of the first 10 ? This is a possible optimization, but it adds unnecessary logic. Also it does not decrease the number of required requests between a client and a server (e.g. when backend sends responses in "bulks" of 10 addresses or more). -- Best Regards / S pozdravom, Pavol Rusnak