Message-ID: <520A93DE.8080409@virtadpt.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 16:15:26 -0400
From: The Doctor <drwho@virtadpt.net>
Organization: Virtual Adept Networks, Unlimited
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:17.0) Gecko/20130514 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
References: <CAEvNM8=zeunvnGBNgjAgs-e9oiTONy1mYOLgA=5DEHK8VUizxw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEvNM8=zeunvnGBNgjAgs-e9oiTONy1mYOLgA=5DEHK8VUizxw@mail.gmail.com>
OpenPGP: id=807B17C1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BitMail.sf.net - encrypted p2p email
Precedence: list
Reply-To: drwho@virtadpt.net

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/09/2013 03:01 PM, Randolph D. wrote:
> anyone tested the secure encrypted p2p email:
> http://bitmail.sf.net

Not lately.  It's pretty CPU and network intensive, which may or may
not be detrimental to your use case.

I keep meaning to read through these security analyses of Bitmessage
but I'm a little short on compute cycles at the moment:

https://bitmessage.org/forum/index.php?topic=1666.0

http://www.reddit.com/r/bitmessage/comments/1fwyx7/a_security_analysis_of_bitmessage/

- -- 
The Doctor [412/724/301/703] [ZS]
Developer, Project Byzantium: http://project-byzantium.org/

PGP: 0x807B17C1 / 7960 1CDC 85C9 0B63 8D9F  DD89 3BD8 FF2B 807B 17C1
WWW: https://drwho.virtadpt.net/

If at first you don't succeed, call for an airstrike.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlIKk94ACgkQO9j/K4B7F8FMsgCgkuM56fI4hVT9H1ueZSFwl9Kk
qRoAoJkKZf4afKgVQKtDO6zRd/Auc/RV
=zwmX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----