Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60FA498D for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:26:58 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f171.google.com (mail-io0-f171.google.com [209.85.223.171]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7BC179 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f171.google.com with SMTP id q21so462014996iod.0 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=adligo-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vrXhIlHkaaHGp8hs0TecQjBugQ59krQhu4Gnb04O4F4=; b=YqYEIJe6HpOHWT/RH2g4rF6aNpAWa2hmZYRbo8CsYdhS8MUD8MYQCR90/icC7ejSmb 965ACio0vinp8S7yu2/k97NMvEGVLjrbBQGRXG4yIMSCr/BK4L3Cdd/Rn5609QLm5rXC vvzup2YNFqG/DWjnkZwc9A6UydG5hRUbKdAM43Qcw37e3IGKC/9ijxIQPDRndhFNtxYq 2BnDU8ADpdmk82B+hnKycnpMX6zCSnIFoDFup0dwDBHhKhjVLaTwNuw25JvGjDqaooS9 DtidY8BxoHVkdl9FCBVJzExLMRkZnMoSkKDefzSM5i3VDB667m2r1i8XMAVWVvaXHwG3 AGoQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vrXhIlHkaaHGp8hs0TecQjBugQ59krQhu4Gnb04O4F4=; b=eZCQd/TJbNlblYvGDRASpX4Ml9ilz2wLy9NndhRBmqX8TY02HEPt7AwyzViLeEPlLc YzTYyzJ73tiluqhFmC12HDqJCF8XQIyPW6cCaxA2e6lxEMvaE4Y8Mfpl6h7I8YLDmzwz rYtnJDxfP9H2/JReHGw47/CNaaQYNd2xL7Bxo9R6oKFZN46gbvVlz/kz8VShX5mgBeEg KljkPhaD6flCXuAJ3FshFFPl4YwmqXHIdTCYwQw+7CWBQzC1geEfwAJUJqjy3BCTTbXa GlwNzEcSl+K9ZHl7D1Vea6cwo3UrDdbZCFczXpVEoIWnOEEKDN9vjh7qjBp75RwLOqrx J7mQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkhroFP3sWwPV2iT9VL3uUl+8nNaAFd85pJfX9DpKMUZ8nCAXQ+5NYu/inpw2LOMOj+r5EiAJwnxTU4uNSL9ocR+HbuDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.157.205 with SMTP id g196mr5780894ioe.144.1452796017151; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.35.19 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Jan 2016 10:26:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 12:26:57 -0600 Message-ID: From: Scott Morgan To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1140a56288ac1405294f6e42 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 20:08:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Fwd: Wallet Lock, Unlock BIP idea X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 18:26:58 -0000 --001a1140a56288ac1405294f6e42 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi Again (buZz), I am aware of wallet encryption, even if encryptwallet was NOT there you could always copy wallet.dat and use a third party encryption /decryption tool. Also any encryption can be broken, although this may not be profitable. I know a few people who still have problems with intruders taking copper pipe out of buildings in Chicago, which is also unprofitable since commodity prices have crashed. Your right that a big waving flag in the block chain may be a bad idea, I figured there would be a good way to obsfucate the information through some one way encryption. Then anyone could check if wallet '1ABC...' is locked by encrypting the wallet address and comparing it to a list of encrypted wallet addresses, but couldn't easily obtain a list of locked or unlocking wallets. I haven't done any detailed work on implementation though, as I mentioned. Cheers, Scott --001a1140a56288ac1405294f6e42 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Again (buZz),

=C2=A0= =C2=A0 I am aware of wallet encryption, even if encryptwallet was NOT there= you could always copy wallet.dat and use a third party encryption /decrypt= ion tool.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Also any encryption can be broken, although this may = not be profitable.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I know a few people who still have problems = with intruders taking copper pipe out of buildings in Chicago, which is als= o unprofitable since commodity prices have crashed.=C2=A0=C2=A0
= =C2=A0=C2=A0 Your right that a big waving flag in the block chain may be a = bad idea, I figured there would be a good way to obsfucate the information = through some one way encryption.=C2=A0 Then anyone could check if wallet &#= 39;1ABC...' is locked by encrypting the wallet address and comparing it= to a list of encrypted wallet addresses, but couldn't easily obtain a = list of locked or unlocking wallets.=C2=A0=C2=A0 I haven't done any det= ailed work on implementation though, as I mentioned.
=C2=A0 <= br>
Cheers,
Scott
=C2=A0
--001a1140a56288ac1405294f6e42--