Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WqLOo-0002h8-Gz for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:55:02 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of petertodd.org designates 62.13.149.84 as permitted sender) client-ip=62.13.149.84; envelope-from=pete@petertodd.org; helo=outmail149084.authsmtp.net; Received: from outmail149084.authsmtp.net ([62.13.149.84]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1WqLOm-0003tO-2k for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 30 May 2014 11:55:01 +0000 Received: from mail-c237.authsmtp.com (mail-c237.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.237]) by punt18.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s4UBs3mh004493; Fri, 30 May 2014 12:54:03 +0100 (BST) Received: from [10.81.247.242] (98-118-0-213.mlp05.net [213.0.118.98] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id s4UBru1M062373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 30 May 2014 12:53:57 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <20140523221726.GA30143@petertodd.org> <20140526163753.GA18693@petertodd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Peter Todd Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 12:43:12 +0300 To: Andreas Schildbach , bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net, gavinandresen@gmail.com Message-ID: X-Server-Quench: 1520c7e9-e7f1-11e3-9f74-002590a135d3 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdQIUFVQNAgsB AmIbWlZeVV57XGQ7 aQtScwVDY0tGQQxi T0xPR01TWkZsZG5D Qx9jUh9wdAJFNn9x ZEJiEHFeXkQpchN0 XxtTQ2wbZGY1a30W BkdcagNUcgZDfk5E aVUrVz1vNG8XDQg5 AwQ0PjZ0MThBJSBS WgQAK04nCVoGBSI6 SgxHBjgiEQsPRjk4 KB0gbEYRAEsLLkI+ PR0mQ11QMgRaFxU/ Fk5EASkx X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1024:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 213.0.118.98/465 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Score: 1.5 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 1.5 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [213.0.118.98 listed in psbl.surriel.com] -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.5 SF_NO_SPF_SPAM SF_NO_SPF_SPAM X-Headers-End: 1WqLOm-0003tO-2k Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] testnet-seed.bitcoin.petertodd.org is up again X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 11:55:03 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 27 May 2014 02:19:39 GMT+03:00, Andreas Schildbach wrote: >> Hey, really sorry I don't have the time to fix this issue, been >> travelling for a few weeks for my consulting job. If you want to >> step up and volunteer please feel free. > >I'm already volunteering. At least I don't get paid for my efforts in >debugging the seed infrastructure. I meant running a seed yourself. Note that I've only received funds to cover expenses and a trivial amount on top to cover some time - about one and a half hours at my usual rates. Gavin: Speaking of, given it looks like my work will be frequently keeping me out of country and unable to provide any more than a "best effort" attempt at running a seed, I'd like to give back the grant funds for doing so. Email me privately with an address to send them too. I have no plans to take it down, however the expectations users have for it aren't something I can provide. >Can you verify if your copy of the seeder contains the commit >8dcc006e6256cb746c2b025daf3df41baa26353e ? > >It fixed a bug that has exactly the symptoms we currently see. > >I wonder if the restart of your server actually changed/fixed >anything. If you got a SERVFAIL this may be because you were traveling >through parts of the world that can't reach your server. Did you >actually try at home, before the restart? I checked via the same proxy both times; I believe the endpoint is located in Europe. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQFQBAEBCAA6BQJTiFKwMxxQZXRlciBUb2RkIChsb3cgc2VjdXJpdHkga2V5KSA8 cGV0ZUBwZXRlcnRvZGQub3JnPgAKCRAZnIM7qOfwhQFCB/4jypD+xzKVp6fqRUxu v22Rc6PeCbeaPYKmdNu0LbY1G5spB8C8ooaZX6z0Ib/CYobzDPJ+rJNB+c1Fna4N 1IdH7ZsrX0GFaEn7Grnp7D2rtOXGZV+1XGFAateIA/caQ9+rJfqkHLuvOI0Fh+Ua /m857rxUNtA1kObLFS7gfhi2gwXGO6KQ3muS3462hXVVc9j7DhOWQQwJba5PL+Je Eob4WtnF2gVFlCEWevxvflF7j4lW9I/S81yZQDnNW9ATF2mfZVqo26sB0yL6Tm4l KgdKx7+w3khv6QfW9Ilx0Ov3Ml2ZMRhBimpbnENbW4jfklsuRQcM0yx6vXS/lIMz LO5s =Up3N -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----