Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Wd3JH-0006Fg-KZ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:58:23 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-ve0-f173.google.com ([209.85.128.173]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Wd3JG-0003Nb-H2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:58:23 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id oy12so1751955veb.4 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:58:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SzmuWomjPjnJHXUk+I7ytgO5kX4mtH8pdONPYzIxjdQ=; b=agEhKagaynyzaLrjofrXen8UC2RFXdmWPKKcdRgb/++L/6xY+Adc7Y9bYSeGPakMSw ijSPTwCzrh6Y4XBLKACm2QhTaNTjNeF/WagFHzBu2RHSzAIKXFO4x3ZJicO4P2j4pcMc 6iBqZ2g1Inw12b0DxZL8AGXLt5seqAgHmi6ocIzaj2px6yuKxxpdrHu1u7FRCKFWo0fa OL1w2XfSW/uaNC3UHnd46GMrtHO2b07emMCJhVY1WQpljo0cJUv6ZoGWsiIXdHWTB/HL dfo1cZ3pXZ2H2YrpWK1w6ToTj2qAdwe+cAgZeOkHDMQ7Eix+UMTSBcp94sPoCsDJ/cts qDZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlPy3INZbec4XSxHMzjyRBMaXfpybEjM/6ZYIVGG00kNZpHDbcok3n8kx6GLVwu84IlXIl8 X-Received: by 10.52.6.162 with SMTP id c2mr36776868vda.6.1398283096977; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:58:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: marek@palatinus.cz Received: by 10.58.234.68 with HTTP; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 12:57:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org> References: <201404231944.14256.luke@dashjr.org> <53581952.1050602@gk2.sk> <201404231955.09287.luke@dashjr.org> From: slush Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 21:57:46 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wsLRTb0wUkcJNgYyEz_40OPVa48 Message-ID: To: Luke-Jr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf303347394a896304f7bb273c X-Spam-Score: 1.0 (+) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (slush[at]centrum.cz) 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Headers-End: 1Wd3JG-0003Nb-H2 Cc: "bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] New BIP32 structure X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:58:23 -0000 --20cf303347394a896304f7bb273c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Luke-Jr wrote: > Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just wouldn't *use* > any > account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive bitcoins; once > the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer associated with the > address or > any other details of how they were received. > Wallet don't see UTXO until it scans all branches/accounts on HD node import. --20cf303347394a896304f7bb273c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

= On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Luke-Jr <luke@dashjr.org> wro= te:
Any wallet should import all the coins just fine, it just w= ouldn't *use* any
account other than 0. Remember addresses are used to receive bitcoins; once=
the UTXOs are in the wallet, they are no longer associated with the address= or
any other details of how they were received.

Wallet don't see UTXO until it scans all branches/accounts on HD = node import.=A0
--20cf303347394a896304f7bb273c--