Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <mh.in.england@gmail.com>) id 1Wwdnq-0000re-Hp
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:46:54 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.214.182; envelope-from=mh.in.england@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-ob0-f182.google.com; 
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182])
	by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Wwdno-0007FS-Ra
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:46:54 +0000
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id nu7so6472371obb.27
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.70.200 with SMTP id o8mr10386183oeu.55.1402951607375;
	Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: mh.in.england@gmail.com
Received: by 10.76.71.162 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 13:46:47 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAFDyEXistfW2Y-93ipty_Z5NgtqT_1BRUNqBsYQNRFz_GjOQ6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKrJrGOBSiY5V59eko6g796j3wh9V9ZLjPbyHeS5=zyX6j3Wdw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP0Euc1mPhRc9e41tU4zMDrWesvVyiBpAPq6M3m7K=aU=A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFDyEXgKpbE4WGAqROJ4J1UST=tXWgfn7uKhRO_tngJfVK_Czw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADE3-jA8LizD8cjdqKm0pFc8OV7JqPBGhs4uvp6=VhEU2emV6w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP3KKSkD7_R0Dvt600b7vh0oia78vHhPrPqSGBbwf9DsSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20140616T181739-326@post.gmane.org>
	<CANEZrP3er1NVoAiVmROTxQ3TC80r7enKaHkWjOYTbKehf7qJjQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20140616T184930-521@post.gmane.org>
	<CANEZrP2fg9k9fC+QAO2GQS7VC-JCtbEjubHB9j1TJtR9vuaDSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<loom.20140616T190550-931@post.gmane.org>
	<CALDj+Bbvvs4rkrSOndk4rbt9JGwSwF1VeFk2XPjFy7Ro4O9heg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP384LFKaCbAL-p06FQdHHp1bqmcRs+XZDbwVXVrPRDS7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFDyEXg8OnoYCNLT1WeX2tBPTB_zcXsZ6ujP_8YmPvGyf4pzkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANEZrP2NKG8etGtGgbkA8rPr3BqCMPmVQ-3xqiKXVOK2vf9+7w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAFDyEXistfW2Y-93ipty_Z5NgtqT_1BRUNqBsYQNRFz_GjOQ6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 22:46:47 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y_BWuKjUwAwiTMfuwYp3Ru-nQfE
Message-ID: <CANEZrP3P-EzS22QCSLuY8u42pZG7yTPNjoa4prQaSZzEjbxESg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mike Hearn <mike@plan99.net>
To: Daniel Rice <drice@greenmangosystems.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1133446031e17704fbfa20cb
X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(mh.in.england[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Wwdno-0007FS-Ra
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Lawrence Nahum <lawrence@greenaddress.it>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] instant confirmation via payment protocol
 backwards compatible proto buffer extension
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 20:46:54 -0000

--001a1133446031e17704fbfa20cb
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Rice <drice@greenmangosystems.com>
wrote:

> True, that would work, but still how are you going to bootstrap the trust?
> TREZOR is well known, but in a future where there could be 100 different
> companies trying to release a similar product to TREZOR it seems like one
> company could corner the market by being the only one that is an accepted
> instant provider at most vendors
>

It's no different to the CA problem. People can only mentally handle a few
trust anchors, so for SSL it goes:

   1 User -> 2-3 browser makers -> 100's of CAs -> millions of websites

The trust starts out narrowly funnelled and grows outwards as things get
outsourced.

For this it'd go

   1 merchant -> 4-5 payment processing engines -> dozens of hardware
manufacturers -> hundreds of thousands of devices

--001a1133446031e17704fbfa20cb
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On M=
on, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Daniel Rice <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"=
mailto:drice@greenmangosystems.com" target=3D"_blank">drice@greenmangosyste=
ms.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">True, that would work, but =
still how are you going to bootstrap the trust? TREZOR is well known, but i=
n a future where there could be 100 different companies trying to release a=
 similar product to TREZOR it seems like one company could corner the marke=
t by being the only one that is an accepted instant provider at most vendor=
s</div>
</blockquote><div><br></div><div>It&#39;s no different to the CA problem. P=
eople can only mentally handle a few trust anchors, so for SSL it goes:</di=
v><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A01 User -&gt; 2-3 browser makers -&gt; 10=
0&#39;s of CAs -&gt; millions of websites</div>
<div><br></div><div>The trust starts out narrowly funnelled and grows outwa=
rds as things get outsourced.</div><div><br></div><div>For this it&#39;d go=
</div><div><br></div><div>=C2=A0 =C2=A01 merchant -&gt; 4-5 payment process=
ing engines -&gt; dozens of hardware manufacturers -&gt; hundreds of thousa=
nds of devices</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div></div></div></div>

--001a1133446031e17704fbfa20cb--