Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org (smtp1.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::138]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7983C001B for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:15:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA61D8102F for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:15:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp1.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tutanota.de Received: from smtp1.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp1.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tyE43WsHYr2K for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:15:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) by smtp1.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB1D780DB9 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2FDFBF5B6; Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:15:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1630923317; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=neF5hO8IngUE76ZjNaldkHRVWJANpBMRGH6ML03uRyc=; b=bjn9WWBvcWjDJ9t7WLA77KAeJ8hV4JgChRjky7V5lgw40zkFsP1s8jKA1rIsxHIX pU3NyqBMvMINEfEeeMc/CKroYF6+QJwbEKe8+9PIy3HpSHFVasC+hEUM1mkDMTpBSOx khAQKsnGL0frH7gXxTmhIPFXowbP9GD8IcoM0FKajvGAU1pJnRmfscuYYS5+ssmezRI hDjzIG2hjHw0EAYq3J8erMSnmYGjONH5E59c3u5OkljW7DvfzKiwWtpP3iuhJTJ3PKM ZW1bU06RFE09n0UXD+YVwx9L6qMl2i2oNZtVpoqqmORTlTJuVAk/JLFPOyKZQVtSSWX 7VnyoFMpag== Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2021 12:15:17 +0200 (CEST) From: Prayank To: billy.tetrud@gmail.com Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_199316_1672975530.1630923317946" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:25:01 +0000 Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Braidpool: Proposal for a decentralised mining pool X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 10:15:21 -0000 ------=_Part_199316_1672975530.1630923317946 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >=C2=A0How would you compare this to Stratum v2? Stratum v2 will help miners with encryption, broadcasting new blocks, signa= lling bits, choose transactions set, however the mining pools can still rej= ect negotiations and censor payments. Maybe Stratum v2 can be used in combination with other things like discreet= log contracts:=C2=A0https://mailmanlists.org/pipermail/dlc-dev/2021-May/00= 0073.html I think Braidpool does this in a better way. --=20 Prayank A3B1 E430 2298 178F ------=_Part_199316_1672975530.1630923317946 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> How would you compare this to Stratum v2?

Stratum v2 will help miners with encryption, broadcasting new blocks, signalling bits, choose transactions set, however the mining pools can still reject negotiations and censor payments.

Maybe Stratum v2 can be used in combination with other things like discreet log contracts: https://mailmanlists.org/pipermail/dlc-dev/2021-May/000073.html

I think Braidpool does this in a better way.


--
Prayank

A3B1 E430 2298 178F
------=_Part_199316_1672975530.1630923317946--