Message-ID: <5590A355.4090105@AndySchroder.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 21:45:57 -0400
From: Andy Schroder <info@AndySchroder.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
	rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
OpenPGP: id=2D44186B;
	url=http://andyschroder.com/static/AndySchroder.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="qag0ub9GtNLfu1KITH885aM4unuW9XoQJ"
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Tree Chains
Precedence: list

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--qag0ub9GtNLfu1KITH885aM4unuW9XoQJ
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

I haven't heard anything about Peter Todd's tree chain idea=20
(https://letstalkbitcoin.com/ltb104-tree-chains-with-peter-todd/) in a=20
while. Is there some reason it has dropped from discussion? Was there=20
some major flaw discovered? It seemed like it would be an additional=20
technology actively discussed as an alternative to raising the block size=
=2E


--=20
Andy Schroder


--qag0ub9GtNLfu1KITH885aM4unuW9XoQJ
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVkKNVAAoJEDT679stRBhre4AIAM2PZzaWG+etNuedvLvU6yM9
Sti3CMqSjyQwy5ZnD0hhzF+C1ITmIOrrYTsrqqBBkpSlBC5ZHirhMi13KcEoLOUP
pIwCpCoQfCgbSGoyl2yolF8pEynYoUu7xH/83R5ftR4OihhSa40QaUY+a4QTsUsS
DJCUutHtGgNxDuWifqWUmVUrqPYA1Xft/QmokhtKjIlIiBZ+STkTz+YNpouc2vLg
Jt9BBD1fbzXLAnmV1UDiRD9iGScOdcPnea8IgpmvH/lmLba90pQaDPl5oSR2FML6
Yxn89NN6dprwts9v1QayBWcCFF4I2cuBhLgdlRwRnfZ6C5YfCtu9R7eDDEPsoKg=
=pyz/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qag0ub9GtNLfu1KITH885aM4unuW9XoQJ--