Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1UcvjO-0005Ns-Sx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:19 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmx.com designates 74.208.4.201 as permitted sender) client-ip=74.208.4.201; envelope-from=bitcoingrant@gmx.com; helo=mout.gmx.net; Received: from mout.gmx.net ([74.208.4.201]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1UcvjO-0006tP-1g for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:18 +0000 Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([172.19.198.45]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus002) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0M6m1I-1UFka00Jts-00wUfL for ; Thu, 16 May 2013 12:48:12 +0200 Received: (qmail 27146 invoked by uid 0); 16 May 2013 10:48:12 -0000 Received: from 108.61.50.108 by rms-us008 with HTTP Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831" Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 06:48:08 -0400 From: bitcoingrant@gmx.com Message-ID: <20130516104809.82690@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Addy Yeow" X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: GMX.com Web Mailer x-registered: 0 X-GMX-UID: PtzmcSlB3zOl2JpasXwh1Hd+IGRvb0BZ X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (bitcoingrant[at]gmx.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [74.208.4.201 listed in list.dnswl.org] X-Headers-End: 1UcvjO-0006tP-1g Cc: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 10:48:19 -0000 --========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit our estimates: ~8000 ----- Original Message ----- From: Addy Yeow Sent: 05/16/13 06:27 AM To: bitcoingrant@gmx.com Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin > Such developments would significantly strengthen the system. Modularization would make cancer attacks less likely and increase the node count, which, currently, is fairly low. Do we know for certain or at least a rough figure of the node count in the network? --========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable our esti= mates: ~8000

=C2=A0

----- Original Message -----

From: Addy Yeow

Sent: 05/16/13 06:27 AM

To: bitcoingrant@gmx.com

Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Modularizing Bitcoin

=C2=A0
> Such developments would significantly strengthe=
n the system. Modularization would make cancer attacks less likely and incr=
ease the node count, which, currently, is fairly low.=20

Do we know for certain or at least a rough figure of the node count in=20
the network?=20

--========GMXBoundary82691368701289793831--