Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193]
	helo=mx.sourceforge.net)
	by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <gappleto97@gmail.com>) id 1Z17nf-000486-Sy
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:41:47 +0000
Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com
	designates 209.85.220.52 as permitted sender)
	client-ip=209.85.220.52; envelope-from=gappleto97@gmail.com;
	helo=mail-pa0-f52.google.com; 
Received: from mail-pa0-f52.google.com ([209.85.220.52])
	by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128)
	(Exim 4.76) id 1Z17ne-0004lN-CP
	for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net;
	Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:41:47 +0000
Received: by padev16 with SMTP id ev16so5541286pad.0
	for <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>;
	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.70.22.131 with SMTP id d3mr11834954pdf.67.1433572900689;
	Fri, 05 Jun 2015 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.194.168 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.194.168 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 23:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM7BtUr7XXT4vctroxcb7kqGu7faWx-KY-fK=KKac1d0bkcXYw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <556CDB09.8050906@henricson.se>
	<CANJO25KUvYNzGLDjr=d_gUSKe0xAju+34W9B6jmcSjQvGXR=2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAEM=y+Xf9b1p-KB-PKzjtMirM8_WMbpMZuQyGyDv+6GM=0O9hA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANJO25K+tG3uH+GH8i4PBjdk8KyJZDAunfwMmWedOJyZOk7wNw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM7BtUoMHE4EwJAFCfOino0UKU5B4-Wzswfvttqs8=mBayK1OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANJO25L-r+3_kR8FD1EZ0F1_Cz9fUO5c8Fz=DW-yKZuONa4qkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM7BtUqN6rYrCrH6Ni5N+ENAwZ85YO53W0oEEkoqkBgsRPpinA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CANJO25LUXBMxAGBruxt6kNkydfJZdJf_nuuvtO+fZ5CTEWV22g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAM7BtUr7XXT4vctroxcb7kqGu7faWx-KY-fK=KKac1d0bkcXYw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2015 02:41:40 -0400
Message-ID: <CANJO25KvK9imRngtHTZdFMFHY8Ua-+D6gj+nfgXebBVBKVud4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
To: Pindar Wong <pindar.wong@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6d871881720f0517d3b38e
X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/)
X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net.
	See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
	-1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for
	sender-domain
	0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider
	(gappleto97[at]gmail.com)
	-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
	0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in
	digit (gappleto97[at]gmail.com)
	1.0 HTML_MESSAGE           BODY: HTML included in message
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from
	author's domain
	0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature,
	not necessarily valid
	-0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Headers-End: 1Z17ne-0004lN-CP
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Meta suggestions for this block size
	debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <bitcoin-development.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_name=bitcoin-development>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-development-request@lists.sourceforge.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 06:41:47 -0000

--047d7b6d871881720f0517d3b38e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Nothing to apologize for. And yes, that's the correct one.
On Jun 6, 2015 2:39 AM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:

> OK... sorry for my confusion.
>
> https://github.com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate
>
> it is.
>
> p.
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please use the one it's originally forked from that Ethan made. I don't
>> want to be the one who sorts through what's valid and what isn't, as I
>> don't have as low-level an understanding as I'd like. I don't feel
>> qualified.
>> On Jun 6, 2015 2:34 AM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Gabe.
>>>
>>> https://github.com/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate
>>>
>>> github's reachable via vpn.
>>>
>>> p.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don't have to bother with the
>>>> exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It's linked in this email chain.
>>>>
>>>> I'll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to start back up on
>>>> this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin so we can get
>>>> some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few leads to chase.
>>>> On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, "Pindar Wong" <pindar.wong@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Gabe,
>>>>>
>>>>> Did you ever get an answer to this?
>>>>>
>>>>> I"ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help with some work on this
>>>>> and will need to do it myself anyways since I'm not sure I understand the
>>>>> nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of things (or not) etc.
>>>>>
>>>>> I would have thought that there would be a testnet4 by now using 8mb
>>>>> blocks... but hey that's just me.
>>>>>
>>>>> p.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have permission to create a page. If someone else does, I'll
>>>>>> happily get a framework started.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <eth3rs@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I second this, I don't have time to read the large number of emails
>>>>>>> generated every day from the block size debate. A summary of the various
>>>>>>> positions and arguments would be extremely helpful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <gappleto97@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way we
>>>>>>>> could condense the information as much as possible. I'll be willing to
>>>>>>>> assist if the page gets approval.
>>>>>>>> On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, "Mats Henricson" <mats@henricson.se> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate
>>>>>>>>> drives me nuts.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will
>>>>>>>>>    take many hours. But if you're rehashing what other
>>>>>>>>>    smarter people have said over and over before, you're
>>>>>>>>>    wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don't.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is
>>>>>>>>>    just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mats
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>>>>>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>

--047d7b6d871881720f0517d3b38e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<p dir=3D"ltr">Nothing to apologize for. And yes, that&#39;s the correct on=
e. </p>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 6, 2015 2:39 AM, &quot;Pindar Wong&quot; =
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pindar.wong@gmail.com">pindar.wong@gmail.com</a>&gt; =
wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"l=
tr"><div><div>OK... sorry for my confusion.<br><br></div><a href=3D"https:/=
/github.com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate" target=3D"_blank">https://github.=
com/EthanHeilman/BlockSizeDebate</a><br><br></div><div>it is.<br><br></div>=
p.<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">O=
n Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:37 PM, gabe appleton <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:gappleto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gappleto97@gmail.com</a>=
&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"ltr">Please =
use the one it&#39;s originally forked from that Ethan made. I don&#39;t wa=
nt to be the one who sorts through what&#39;s valid and what isn&#39;t, as =
I don&#39;t have as low-level an understanding as I&#39;d like. I don&#39;t=
 feel qualified. </p><div><div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 6, 2015 2:34 AM, &quot;Pindar Wong&quot; =
&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pindar.wong@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pindar.wong@=
gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Thanks Gabe.<br><br><a href=3D"https://github.co=
m/gappleto97/BlockSizeDebate" target=3D"_blank">https://github.com/gappleto=
97/BlockSizeDebate</a><br><br></div><div>github&#39;s reachable via vpn.<br=
><br></div>p.<br><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gma=
il_quote">On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:28 PM, gabe appleton <span dir=3D"ltr">&=
lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gappleto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gappleto97@gma=
il.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"=
margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p dir=3D"lt=
r">Yeah. We made a git repo instead, so we don&#39;t have to bother with th=
e exclusive-by-default wiki policies. It&#39;s linked in this email chain. =
</p>
<p dir=3D"ltr">I&#39;ll be getting home tomorrow, so I should be able to st=
art back up on this. A few days from now we should throw this on /r/Bitcoin=
 so we can get some more public comment on it. They already gave me a few l=
eads to chase.</p><div><div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 5, 2015 11:34 PM, &quot;Pindar Wong&quot;=
 &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:pindar.wong@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">pindar.wong=
@gmail.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmai=
l_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left=
:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Gabe,<br><br></div>Did you ever get an ans=
wer to this?<br><br>I&quot;ll have some time tomorrow to be able to help wi=
th some work on this and will need to do it myself anyways since I&#39;m no=
t sure I understand the nuances, where bitcoin XT fits into the scheme of t=
hings (or not) etc.<br><br></div><div>I would have thought that there would=
 be a testnet4 by now using 8mb blocks... but hey that&#39;s just me. <br><=
br></div><div>p.<br><br></div><div><br><br><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><=
div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 11:52 AM, gabe appleton <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gappleto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blan=
k">gappleto97@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail=
_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:=
1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I don&#39;t have permission to create a page. If some=
one else does, I&#39;ll happily get a framework started.</div><div><div><di=
v class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 =
at 11:32 PM, Ethan Heilman <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:eth3rs@g=
mail.com" target=3D"_blank">eth3rs@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #cc=
c solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir=3D"ltr">I second this, I don&#39;t have =
time to read the large number of emails generated every day from the block =
size debate. A summary of the various positions and arguments would be extr=
emely helpful.=C2=A0</div><div><div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div cla=
ss=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 11:02 PM, gabe appleton <span dir=
=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:gappleto97@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">gapp=
leto97@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote"=
 style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><p=
 dir=3D"ltr">Also, can we try to get a wiki page for the debate? That way w=
e could condense the information as much as possible. I&#39;ll be willing t=
o assist if the page gets approval. </p><div><div>
<div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Jun 1, 2015 6:41 PM, &quot;Mats Henricson&quo=
t; &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:mats@henricson.se" target=3D"_blank">mats@henricso=
n.se</a>&gt; wrote:<br type=3D"attribution"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quot=
e" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">=
Hi!<br>
<br>
My fingers have been itching many times now, this debate<br>
drives me nuts.<br>
<br>
I just wish all posters could follow two simple principles:<br>
<br>
1. Read up. Yes. All of what has been written. Yes, it will<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0take many hours. But if you&#39;re rehashing what other<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0smarter people have said over and over before, you&#39;re<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0wasting hundreds of peoples time. Please don&#39;t.<br>
<br>
2. Be helpful. Suggest alternatives. Just cristizising is<br>
=C2=A0 =C2=A0just destructive. If you want no change, then say so.<br>
<br>
Mats<br>
<br>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------=
---<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div><br>-----------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>-----------------------------------------------------------=
-------------------<br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Bitcoin-development mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net" target=3D"_bla=
nk">Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net</a><br>
<a href=3D"https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development=
" target=3D"_blank">https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de=
velopment</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>
</blockquote></div>

--047d7b6d871881720f0517d3b38e--