Return-Path: <aj@erisian.com.au>
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [IPv6:2605:bc80:3010::136])
 by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7438FC002B
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 06:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AE5D61373
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 06:47:43 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 3AE5D61373
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id XOn-26S7fFrd
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 06:47:42 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org D3A3460B26
Received: from azure.erisian.com.au (azure.erisian.com.au [172.104.61.193])
 by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3A3460B26
 for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 06:47:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from aj@azure.erisian.com.au (helo=sapphire.erisian.com.au)
 by azure.erisian.com.au with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92 #3 (Debian))
 id 1pR69A-0001un-0Z; Sun, 12 Feb 2023 16:47:38 +1000
Received: by sapphire.erisian.com.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Sun, 12 Feb 2023 16:47:31 +1000
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 16:47:31 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <aj@erisian.com.au>
To: Russell O'Connor <roconnor@blockstream.com>,
 Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Message-ID: <Y+iLg8m8STaud+ep@erisian.com.au>
References: <CAAQdECCH=YOcu4g6Ku1_G4CnRg6rsaFPFPwbABx9aZin9A8+2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <Y+JWLsc80gxL4kpG@camus> <Y+KUAlsPc8ohPecb@camus>
 <CAMZUoK=u2114uv0Uc0u_RVMBv-cq-gJiNxiyOk_T_xxTYO0Ghw@mail.gmail.com>
 <VWZ9Dc2gIe0Y02yY3qSbjQTEPqwCm6YAtRzfNrIANBXCEJzr73SdxZT4LwBKDyriDfmDZyTlkKWtoZmVIUbYqqZUAeTMDLHUNFCBwR6hitQ=@protonmail.com>
 <CAMZUoKkGCEZ+8zW_8WfE4=q2x+gcC4vR06gxTW3XwgpH5WGXSw@mail.gmail.com>
 <6C1009F7-A90A-4B7D-8ED3-C0E9399873B6@erisian.com.au>
 <CAMZUoKm3OJ4DVCnpGk+CfJGnMMnuJqsqNMr-sJh53Rx99wj9CA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMZUoKm3OJ4DVCnpGk+CfJGnMMnuJqsqNMr-sJh53Rx99wj9CA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Spam-Score-int: -18
X-Spam-Bar: -
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Unenforceable fee obligations in multiparty
 protocols with Taproot inputs
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>, 
 <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 06:47:43 -0000

On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 09:40:38AM -0500, Russell O'Connor via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Yes.  If you would otherwise sign the tapleaf, then I would recommend also
> signing the entire tapbranch.

Opened https://github.com/bitcoin-inquisition/bitcoin/issues/19 for
this.

(I think it's better to call it the path to the leaf, as "tapbranch"
seems more to refer to each splitting step in the tree)

Cheers,
aj