Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9937D1893 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:11:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA0B138 for ; Thu, 1 Oct 2015 00:11:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so5564868wic.0 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=L9lyPY0tbZ+CiH8q0e3c8OQa2YYBBlhe2RP4ND7J7cA=; b=dEPpS4DfajqPC44mQQvj4mxTz26K9Fqv16M2fMbQe/Q+ntI9V3cJYNYsgs6ZnhW7bl encWBJ5s8LnVilCYnvSmDh7nfdvlSllY20y8XuENoGXRuNeKyK4duVXe6D8HY4u1QXbl aBFiK4vmxdWAAdUAPBWUXrIYQBHEIzerETfJc75Ykd/BN3oVPnTXTHL7xRQ8/lgn9Nlo lj/vX12YDFwaT5GQkivzcAHM5yw9ylvXbwoRPq5bhbnKMvy84NSS1ULsZHTqsLUKgIOy HpJfwJvKYboKuTrqeJbrGHHxReVsXOF66RSmZmTEwmUXRlIJKDhJ/6kkzWW7APwDKLA8 1sXg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndKySHT1yCR+Na/FCNq3HsDnDoHOzW0xGZRbK4Ai/FVj+4izxOZ40CGypNFWk1YB2650Ya MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.186.98 with SMTP id fj2mr176621wic.58.1443658309713; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.114.199 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 17:11:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2015 02:11:49 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?B?Sm9yZ2UgVGltw7Nu?= To: Mike Hearn Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 00:11:51 -0000 --001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Tim=C3=B3n" wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually disappear > > > > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its memory pool > > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks forever until > > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for weeks afte= r > > P2SH triggered. > > > > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() can do this, > > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any miner that > > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard. > > That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said. Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as explained by Greg Maxwell. --001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Oct 1, 2015 12:14 AM, "Jorge Tim=C3=B3n" <jtimon@jtimon.cc&= gt; wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:06 PM, Mike Hearn <hearn@vinumeris.com> wrote:
> >> Exactly, all those "mini divergences" eventually di= sappear
> >
> > A miner that has accepted a newly invalid transaction into its me= mory pool
> > and is trying to mine it, will keep producing invalid blocks fore= ver until
> > the owner shuts it down and upgrades. This was happening for week= s after
> > P2SH triggered.
> >
> > For instance, any miner that has modified/bypassed IsStandard() c= an do this,
> > or any miner that accepts direct transaction submission, or any m= iner that
> > runs an old node from before OP_NOPs were made non-standard.
>
> That is correct. But doesn't seem to contradict anything I said.

Actually, no, sorry, the second paragraph is not correct as = explained by Greg Maxwell.

--001a11c263d8ba5ec80520ffe4c3--