Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2BFE2E for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from zinan.dashjr.org (zinan.dashjr.org [192.3.11.21]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38DB7775 for ; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ishibashi.lan (adsl-98-70-226-244.gnv.bellsouth.net [98.70.226.244]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 79CA138A0DAE; Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:17:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Hashcash: 1:25:190722:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org::0rZ0E3onjMRuiXE+:agrPW X-Hashcash: 1:25:190722:dev@jonasschnelli.ch::GvGpjUA/HS4ZDSrQ:byyqh X-Hashcash: 1:25:190722:andreas@schildbach.de::AGKTybCWeS0/yGi2:MEKv X-Hashcash: 1:25:190722:lf-lists@mattcorallo.com::CZ8iFpeMfr4ckKfl:kFsy From: Luke Dashjr To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org, Jonas Schnelli Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:17:28 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <59fad2b6-9b15-ffec-116e-91d27ce29f80@mattcorallo.com> <122FF05A-8A80-4C13-95D1-BA67B602246A@jonasschnelli.ch> In-Reply-To: <122FF05A-8A80-4C13-95D1-BA67B602246A@jonasschnelli.ch> X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201907221717.30281.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:38:39 +0000 Cc: Andreas Schildbach Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Core to disable Bloom-based Filtering by default X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2019 17:18:22 -0000 On Monday 22 July 2019 13:25:25 Jonas Schnelli via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > I also think as long as we don't have an alternative, we should improve > > the current filtering for segwit. E.g. testing the scripts themselves > > and each scriptPubKey spent by any input against the filter would do, > > and it also fixes the main privacy issue with server-side filtering > > (wallets have to add two items per address to the filter). > > I think the consensus among protocol developers is (please speak up), that > BIP37 (public server based tx filtering) =E2=80=93 in general =E2=80=93 w= as a conceptual > mistake. Maybe extending it further is the wrong step, especially when > promising alternatives like BIP158 (neutrino) are around. Neutrino is very controversial, and NOT less trustful than bloom filters. It also uses significantly more bandwidth. It seems a better approach is to add Stratum (Electrum) support, and to lim= it=20 usage of all pseudo-SPV protocols to trusted peers. > The fact that nobody cared about extending it for SW may also underline t= hat > BIP37 is seen as a conceptual mistake and/or "low interest in further > extensions=E2=80=9C.=20 Eric Lombrozo added segwit support. While it was never reviewed for Core, i= t=20 has been included and supported in Knots since v0.15.1. As I understand it,= =20 his mSIGNA wallet also makes usage of the feature. Luke