Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C22761678 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE3C112 for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 21:37:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (Unknown [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:37:04 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp> <1819769.E416F0XigG@garp> <9269B3FB-2ED2-469D-9FE2-783CC2EB252C@gmx.com> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <5612ED72.1060802@bitcoins.info> Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 17:36:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork technical debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:37:08 -0000 On 10/5/2015 5:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev wrote: > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev > wrote: >> Once again, let’s use the current gridlock > > there is no gridlock here and an effort to manufacturer > one for political reasons will not be successful. Worthless discussion over the definition of "gridlock." Russ