Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh5qE-0003z7-Mp for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:01:22 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of bitpay.com designates 209.85.213.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.213.181; envelope-from=jgarzik@bitpay.com; helo=mail-ig0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-ig0-f181.google.com ([209.85.213.181]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1Xh5qD-0000yk-IO for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:01:22 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l13so489645iga.14 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:01:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=AxXqlKpGzZD/FhOtm7GHRsM6ah0rp9l7w0ePyNh5E0g=; b=H/520RRAbjNvUgeaXzxBux6OyjEFAu7B1xmpmEIzoaTozGpWlXALsOPjTfs/PrfaMS dV6zdzCgwRVsv9todyEuocKMnwlZQug6mZHlsHGfzf9WtXXdyrnqlYOaqSeB/m5j4rVF Ljnnkq9vGvRzGla2Tr/Nql0pW3+6gwA3IHcEgQg+JY60k1LopVJWIDpTrWNldffYXyuW rqypWSYxyfY/ZfsqZWkTpa8HSnemsteZoxOyocHP2+EGZKhIvyzlfLRkQGtytEbzNy8A zhIROu/oUEsfiJtNzrF0bCV8ygRB9BogjPue1Bp4njGri6dBUQgQ3khSdujlW9mzfykU M8Rw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmyQ4zEIjSBLd79ZwV1b2cTtqnPUhq5thP5vvsDEl5xzI5/+V8QRkBH5nzIhToxxJE62nAV X-Received: by 10.107.136.68 with SMTP id k65mr1366517iod.43.1414022475847; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:01:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.156.193 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 17:00:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Jeff Garzik Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:00:55 -0400 Message-ID: To: Daniel Murrell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.8 THIS_AD "This ad" and variants X-Headers-End: 1Xh5qD-0000yk-IO Cc: Bitcoin-Dev Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] side-chains & 2-way pegging (Re: is there a way to do bitcoin-staging?) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 00:01:22 -0000 Take the discussion of this site to another M-L, please. It is off-topic. Actual discussion of the paper and side-chains is on-topic. This M-L is publicly archived. On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Daniel Murrell wrote: > Sorry Bryan, this was the first paper posted to this list since I've > been on it that I added to my site. I was quite excited about this. > > I was not planning on and certainly won't be making this advertisement > after every paper posted on this list (I may do it on reddit). I did > post on reddit a few times yes, but I assumed that this list's user > base didn't overlap extremely (does it?). I'm not sure why my posts > got down voted there. The down voters gave me no constructive feedback > about the usefulness of my site, and neither have you. > > Are you able to give me your feedback on the site I've spent quite > some time setting up privately so that we don't spam this list again? > > > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Bryan Bishop wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Daniel Murrell wrote: >>> p.s. I'm not trying to monetize this site. I just tried to make >>> something I thought could be useful. >> >> [Unsolicited administrivia follows.] >> >> You have been posting this in a bunch of places for a while now, at >> least three times today by my count on other mediums. I also observed >> negative karma scores associated with these posts. Maybe you could >> consider toning down the message frequency? I think by now everyone >> knows you want them to use your site. I also think that in the limit >> that it would be inappropriate for /everyone/ to post all possible >> research sites, or even vaguely topical discussion sites, for every >> paper posted. Personally, I would much rather have discussions happen >> on the mailing list anyway, although if I had a different opinion I >> certainly hope I would still send this message. >> >> Thank you. >> >> - Bryan >> http://heybryan.org/ >> 1 512 203 0507 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development -- Jeff Garzik Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist BitPay, Inc. https://bitpay.com/