Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEAAB1746 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:04:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.help.org (mail.help.org [70.90.2.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39CE9A9 for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 06:04:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.1.10.25] (Unknown [10.1.10.25]) by mail.help.org with ESMTPA ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 02:04:03 -0400 To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <5613573C.1080002@bitcoins.info> <561360F4.2010906@bitcoins.info> <201510060553.21578.luke@dashjr.org> From: Milly Bitcoin Message-ID: <56136445.6020806@bitcoins.info> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 02:03:49 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201510060553.21578.luke@dashjr.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork technical debate X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 06:04:07 -0000 This list is about "Development discussion list for Bitcoin protocol and its implementation" So legal notices placed on the software is relevant to the list. It is also relevant that you go around speaking with authority when you have no idea what you are talking about. A copyright is a legal notice and the courts care how the notice is written. The purpose of the notice is to notify people of potential litigation if they use the software in a certain way. You want to claim "off topic" because you caught spouting nonsense and you want to divert attention elsewhere. Russ On 10/6/2015 1:53 AM, Luke Dashjr wrote: > Copyright doesn't care how notices are written. They are merely informative > to humans reading them. Anyhow, this is not development related, so please > direct any further discussion of it to me directly (with any applicable CCs) > and NOT to the mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Luke