Received: from sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.192] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1YBXkj-0007N8-Qb for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:53:33 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of gmail.com designates 209.85.217.181 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.217.181; envelope-from=elombrozo@gmail.com; helo=mail-lb0-f181.google.com; Received: from mail-lb0-f181.google.com ([209.85.217.181]) by sog-mx-2.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1YBXki-0008OI-KA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:53:33 +0000 Received: by mail-lb0-f181.google.com with SMTP id u14so1160559lbd.12 for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:53:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.112.142.201 with SMTP id ry9mr6885793lbb.4.1421279606205; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.61.106 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.61.106 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:53:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com> References: <1421257150.8969.4.camel@niftybox.net> <6E575287-887C-4628-834C-282B67AFAA94@eeqj.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 15:53:26 -0800 Message-ID: From: Eric Lombrozo To: Jeffrey Paul Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e011836aa0df231050ca5720b X-Spam-Score: -0.6 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (elombrozo[at]gmail.com) -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature X-Headers-End: 1YBXki-0008OI-KA Cc: Bitcoin Dev , Ruben de Vries Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] convention/standard for sorting public keys for p2sh multisig transactions X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 23:53:33 -0000 --089e011836aa0df231050ca5720b Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I would highly recommend NOT using Base58 for anything except stuff that is to be copy/pasted by the enduser. Internally, pubkeys are DER-encoded integers. - Eric On Jan 14, 2015 2:54 PM, "Jeffrey Paul" wrote: > > > On 20150114, at 09:39, devrandom wrote: > > > > At CryptoCorp we recommend to our customers that they sort > > lexicographically by the public key bytes of the leaf public keys. i.e. > > the same as BitPay. > > To clarify: the raw bytes of the public key itself, not the ascii base58 > representation of the pubkey hash - right? > > -jp > > -- > Jeffrey Paul EEQJ > jp@eeqj.com https://eeqj.com > +1-800-403-1126 (America) +1-312-361-0355 (Worldwide) > 5539 AD00 DE4C 42F3 AFE1 1575 0524 43F4 DF2A 55C2 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA. > GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. > Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth. > Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/gigenet > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development > --089e011836aa0df231050ca5720b Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I would highly recommend NOT using Base58 for anything excep= t stuff that is to be copy/pasted by the enduser.

Internally, pubkeys are DER-encoded integers.

- Eric

On Jan 14, 2015 2:54 PM, "Jeffrey Paul"= ; <jp@eeqj.com> wrote:

> On 20150114, at 09:39, devrandom <c1.sf-bitcoin@niftybox.net> wrote:
>
> At CryptoCorp we recommend to our customers that they sort
> lexicographically by the public key bytes of the leaf public keys.=C2= =A0 i.e.
> the same as BitPay.

To clarify: the raw bytes of the public key itself, not the ascii base58 re= presentation of the pubkey hash - right?

-jp

--
Jeffrey Paul=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 EEQJ
jp@eeqj.com=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0https://eeqj.com
+1-800-403-1126=C2=A0(America)=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 +1-312-361-035= 5 (Worldwide)
5539 AD00 DE4C 42F3 AFE1=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 = =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 1575 0524 43F4 DF2A 55C2


---------------------------------------------------------------------------= ---
New Year. New Location. New Benefits. New Data Center in Ashburn, VA.
GigeNET is offering a free month of service with a new server in Ashburn. Choose from 2 high performing configs, both with 100TB of bandwidth.
Higher redundancy.Lower latency.Increased capacity.Completely compliant. http://p.sf.net/s= fu/gigenet
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-develo= pment@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-de= velopment
--089e011836aa0df231050ca5720b--