Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1RqxM4-0004A1-35 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([173.242.112.54]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1RqxM2-0002UX-Re for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (fl-184-4-164-217.dhcp.embarqhsd.net [184.4.164.217]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21C8D5606F8; Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:17 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:45:09 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.1.5-gentoo; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) References: <1327704664.31621.YahooMailNeo@web121003.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <201201271800.31819.luke@dashjr.org> <05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com> In-Reply-To: <05d62c81-ef50-4c43-8fa5-65592c8f54a4@email.android.com> X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: CE5A D56A 36CC 69FA E7D2 3558 665F C11D D53E 9583 X-PGP-Key-ID: 665FC11DD53E9583 X-PGP-Keyserver: x-hkp://subkeys.pgp.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201201272045.10787.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1RqxM2-0002UX-Re Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] BIP 0020: URI Scheme X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2012 01:45:24 -0000 On Friday, January 27, 2012 7:36:31 PM bitcoin-list@bluematt.me wrote: > It was implemented in the waylaying client with the merge of Bitcoin-Qt for > drag and drop, and just recently for system URI handling in > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/commit/70f55355e29c8e45b607e782c5d76609 > d23cc858. It's been implemented in many clients for nearly all 2011. Bitcoin-Qt is just behind the pace. Not relevant. > However the version on the wiki armed as BIP 20 has a ton of extraneous crap > in it's number encoding which is not implemented in Bitcoin-Qt since it was > explicitly voted against at the time the spec was being discussed. You mean 3 months *after* the spec had a consensus and multiple implementations.