Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-3.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1Vpddg-00052U-QF for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:39:12 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from zinan.dashjr.org ([192.3.11.21]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1Vpddf-0006XI-LV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:39:12 +0000 Received: from ishibashi.localnet (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:5:265:be5f:f4ff:febf:4f76]) (Authenticated sender: luke-jr) by zinan.dashjr.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7582510803C0; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:39:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "Luke-Jr" To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 12:39:02 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.12.1-gentoo; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <52A3C8A5.7010606@gmail.com> <1795f3067ba3fcdd0caf978cc59ff024.squirrel@fruiteater.riseup.net> In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key-Fingerprint: E463 A93F 5F31 17EE DE6C 7316 BD02 9424 21F4 889F X-PGP-Key-ID: BD02942421F4889F X-PGP-Keyserver: hkp://pgp.mit.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201312081239.03166.luke@dashjr.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.1 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: github.com] -0.1 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1Vpddf-0006XI-LV Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Dedicated server for bitcoin.org, your thoughts? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 12:39:13 -0000 On Sunday, December 08, 2013 10:00:35 AM Drak wrote: > Also it's about time we hosted the Bitcoin Qt software at Github. They have > a releases feature where you can upload a packaged release (see > https://github.com/blog/1547-release-your-software). There are also no > adverts (another privacy leak at the least) and many feel are more > trustworthy than Sourceforge: it also makes sense to have the downloads > where the source is developed. I'm not aware of any rational basis for trusting GitHub more than SourceForge. At least SourceForge is transparent and releases their source code. Luke